<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Might sound good in theory. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20373727</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:18:46 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:18:46 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Might sound good in theory.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20373727</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/782124"><b>BeesTea</b></A> : Great idea in theory probably.  Essentially taking the fast-flux DNS method used by miscreants and using it to take on DDOS by way of volume.  This is probably the gist of Akamai service.<br><br>Here's where I think the wagon leaves the road.  With a commercial service like Akamai, you have an SLA that says they'll serve exactly the content you've decided.  With the ad-hoc militia-man method, while good in intent, doesn't do anything to protect from rogue nodes directing hosts as they see fit to whatever content they choose.  This is probably a major issue.<br><br>I didn't have time to do more than skim the last half of the paper,  but I think the gist of it points to this weakness.<br><br>EDIT: typo<br><br><small>--<br>Overpower, overcome.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20373727</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:43:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
