<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Good Writeup in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20378510</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:14:16 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:14:16 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Good Writeup</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20384689</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1"><b>justin</b></A> : That would be even harder than serving them a normal page upon request.<br><br>Some newer web servers have introduced a way of giving preference and priority to existing users (on the site before it got full up), or users with an encrypted token that they pick up when they login.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20384689</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:03:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good Writeup</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20383043</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/475801"><b>SND2005</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  justin <A HREF="/useremail/u/1"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>No, they didn't tell me. Just an opinion they had on the best way to mitigate. I can see where they are coming from it sucks to have other customers knocked around.<br> </div>Would it be possible to switch over to a "CAPTCHA" type mechanism to weed out real traffic during an attack? Possibly you could route requests from BOTs back to themselves, and route positive CAPTCHA replies to the real web or backup web address? Sorta a pseudo secret handshake? ;-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20383043</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:02:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good Writeup</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380615</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1265751"><b>Calliope</b></A> : Thank you for the article. Although I do not understand it in its entirety, it is certainly enlightening and answered a few questions for me. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380615</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:38:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good Writeup</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20379194</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1"><b>justin</b></A> : No, they didn't tell me. Just an opinion they had on the best way to mitigate. I can see where they are coming from it sucks to have other customers knocked around.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20379194</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:22:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Good Writeup</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20378510</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><b>Matt</b></A> : Good info Justin. Can't wait for the 2nd article with technical specifics.<br><br>Also, did NAC really tell you to just "not piss people off"? Wow.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20378510</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:51:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
