Re: Ummmm in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20378734 en Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:41:41 EDT Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:41:41 EDT Re: Ummmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20382863 gaforces : Now that I thought about it, I figure Intel wants a workable deployment plan before they stick their neck out too far. It also gives them time to work out the bugs on the chipset and get them to vendors.
--
There is no greater sign of a general decay of virtue in a nation, than a want of zeal in its inhabitants for the good of their country. ~ Joseph Addison]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20382863 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:29:02 EDT Re: Ummmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20382809 patcat88 : If Intel was serious about WiMAX, I would see force bundled WiMAX laptops on shelves right now. Why would anyone get WiMAX over a much bigger EVDO or HSDPA network when it will be the same price and only slightly faster?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20382809 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:18:56 EDT Re: Ummmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380736 tc1uscg :
said by zduice See Profile :

I am probably wrong here. But install the fiber backhaul on a Sprint owned or leased property (e.g.: middle of a city). Place a WiMax tower on that property and broadcast to all the other towers that are not fiber and/or microwave accessible and have these towers act as relays or repeaters for the service. WiMax range is 25 - 30 miles?
Citywide access and burbs are still using LEC's to provide that last mile. Even with MAN's, there would be thousands of runs to each tower. Fibertower is doing the microwave bit for but obviously not fast enough. But this info leaked out like mid 1st quarter that the T1's provided by LEC's can't handle the speed. Sprint could, to save face, just step up and tell the industry they will go ahead and set everything up, using the slower path and continue to "upgrade" theses paths but can you imagane the crap Sprint would take (from media and the likes of VZW/AT&T) if they did that? At least it would truely be deployed as they said but not providing the speeds they reported.. at least not yet. :huh:]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380736 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:58:48 EDT Re: Ummmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380313 zduice : I am probably wrong here. But install the fiber backhaul on a Sprint owned or leased property (e.g.: middle of a city). Place a WiMax tower on that property and broadcast to all the other towers that are not fiber and/or microwave accessible and have these towers act as relays or repeaters for the service. WiMax range is 25 - 30 miles?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380313 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:43:11 EDT Re: Ummmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20379175 gaforces :
said by Matt See Profile :

Why not just use WiMAX for backhaul? Is it not reliable enough ... not fast enough ... do they not have enough spectrum?
I expect it's a money issue and Intel isn't following through with it. If thats the case Intel is shooting itself in the foot by not helping the rollout more.
--
There is no greater sign of a general decay of virtue in a nation, than a want of zeal in its inhabitants for the good of their country. ~ Joseph Addison]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20379175 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:19:40 EDT Re: Ummmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20378734 bobjohnson :
said by Matt See Profile :

Why not just use WiMAX for backhaul? Is it not reliable enough ... not fast enough ... do they not have enough spectrum?
edit: nevermind]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20378734 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:45:40 EDT Ummmm http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20378703 Matt : Why not just use WiMAX for backhaul? Is it not reliable enough ... not fast enough ... do they not have enough spectrum?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20378703 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:41:09 EDT