Re: No in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20379839 en Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:47:50 EDT Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:47:50 EDT Re: No http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20383223 Thespis : Where would you go?
What country does less surveillance on its own citizens?
I'm not being argumentative, I honestly can't think of one...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20383223 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:31:53 EDT Re: No http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20381065 SilverSurfer :
said by ender7074 See Profile :

I think the FBI is overreaching it's power here.
ROFLMAO. Ya think?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20381065 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:52:14 EDT Re: No http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380043 Done_Posting : I agree with you 100%. This is just wrong, and it needs to be stopped. I can understand real-time surveillance on a subject when the proper warrants are obtained, but to insist on blanket surveillance of everything your users do and then to demand the information be stored for two years on top of that is just insane.

Every time I read an article like this it makes me want to renounce my citizenship and leave.

- Tate

--
Happiness is an OC-768 in your basement...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380043 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:58:04 EDT Re: No http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20379839 knightmb : As an ISP, I can tell you this law would make it as bad as trying to keep a backup of the entire Internet every night. Our ISP is very small and we still push out Gigabits of traffic everyday. Imagine trying to keep all of that for 2 years. I don't think we could buy enough Terabyte drives to meet those needs and thus we've filed a complaint. :D]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20379839 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:21:13 EDT Re: No http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20379506 amigo_boy :
said by ender7074 See Profile :

I'm all for national security and catching criminals but this is getting a bit out of hand. Do they have any idea how much infrastructure it would take to keep that much info for 2 years? I think the FBI is overreaching it's power here.
It's a conundrum, isn't it? I mentioned this in previous topics critical of the NSA's wholesale reception of internet traffic. If law enforcement is supposed to have access to historic "call records" (like we've established they do with phone records) then the Internet has created a huge gap. I said that those who don't want the government maintaining that historic information would probably complain if ISPs were required to do it. And, now here we are. :)

Mark]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20379506 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:26:45 EDT No http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20379009 ender7074 : I'm all for national security and catching criminals but this is getting a bit out of hand. Do they have any idea how much infrastructure it would take to keep that much info for 2 years? I think the FBI is overreaching it's power here.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20379009 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:42:44 EDT