<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Very nice in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20384793</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:31:23 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:31:23 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Very nice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20388160</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1005317"><b>BOGBS</b></A> : They are probably using ADSL2+, and that's the upload limitation.  Even Annex M can little more than triple the speeds, and not very many providers in the US have it thoroughly tested..<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITU_G.992.5_Annex_M" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITU_G.992.5_Annex_M</A><br><br>Only so much can be milked out of copper, depending on which type of xDSL used, and then the distance limitations increase even more so.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20388160</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:34:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Very nice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20384793</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/571743"><b>Boricua65</b></A> : For that price I'll take it.  I really wish they pay attention to the upload speeds, that is way too slow.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20384793</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:23:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
