<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>modifyng duplexers in Ham Radio</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20391402</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:05:00 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:05:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: modifyng duplexers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409175</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1315000"><b>KA3SGM</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  UHF <A HREF="/useremail/u/635256"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>with 600khz spacing you need really good duplexers, pass only isn't going to cut it, there will be de-sense.  You need the bigger pass/reject cavities.  Most duplexers made for non-ham use just won't tune for ham use.<br> </div>Not always true, most of the WACOM cavities that I have seen in HAM use work quite well, and they are only 5.5" diameter, and maybe 24" tall.<br><br>They however are usually rated for 137-170MHz.<br><br>Mind that I am also referring to a set of 4 cavities(2 TX Pass/ 2 RX Reject)<br><br>Depending on TX power, other co-located repeaters on nearby frequencies, or using 2 antennas(1 TX/1 RX) with a bit of vertical separation, it might still work.<br><br>Due to the high silver plating content inside the cavities, is the option a $1k+ replacement, or can you have the cheaper solution make do??<br><br>Not saying it will work, but there are quite a bit of other variables in your situation to consider.<br><small>--<br>"Lithium is no longer available on credit"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409175</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:52:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: modifyng duplexers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20397500</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/635256"><b>UHF</b></A> : with 600khz spacing you need really good duplexers, pass only isn't going to cut it, there will be de-sense.  You need the bigger pass/reject cavities.  Most duplexers made for non-ham use just won't tune for ham use.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20397500</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:05:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: modifyng duplexers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20394286</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/898445"><b>RFJUNKIE</b></A> : On  my last post I meant tunable plunger not shunt....<br> I will go to the link u posted and see what info I can come up with ...<br>i need to borrow the spectrum analyzer again and sweep them. I rushed this hoping i could tune and go.. not going to happen!!! I need to recheck everything coax lengths and possible swr issues...<br><br>THANKS..I will post resolution]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20394286</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:10:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: modifyng duplexers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20393454</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1315000"><b>KA3SGM</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  RFJUNKIE <A HREF="/useremail/u/898445"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Cleaning up or 145.310 repeater... we are in a shared building and had the big 10" Motorola cavaties took to much shelf space.. I acquired a set of six Decible 5" 148-170mhz pass cavities(db4001-2) they will not tune tight enough on 145.310 they start losing Q at abt 148mhz can i modify the loops to move them down in freq??? or do i have to lengthen the tunable shunt also .... I cant find much info on mods on cavities...I can look at them on a spectrum analyzer but don't want to hack a good set of cavities then find it wont work.. <br> </div>I am figuring that you already have run the external tuning stubs out as far as possible???<br><br>The physical cavities being smaller are probably not capable of going below 148MHz, but the tuning stubs are more of a limitation.<br><br>I am thinking the cavities themselves might be able to go lower in frequency, but longer tunning stubs would be required, and as mentioned that as the Q drops off at 148MHz, the signal loss would also be going through the roof.<br><br>If you have a spectrum analyzer available, it would be interesting to see if you can set the notch frequencies to spec, and find out how bad the loss is.<br><br>If you don't get a better answer here, try posting the question at:<br> <br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/" >www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/</A>  <br><br>That is the best repeater owner/builder site that I know of, with a lot of long time experts to ask questions.<br><br>(KeysCapt please take note of that site as well.  ;) )<br><br>Maybe you could trade off with someone else that has a repeater at +147MHz with a + .600 offset that might be more compatible??   :huh:<br><small>--<br>"Lithium is no longer available on credit"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20393454</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 23:47:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>modifyng duplexers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20391402</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/898445"><b>RFJUNKIE</b></A> : Cleaning up or 145.310 repeater... we are in a shared building and had the big 10" Motorola cavaties took to much shelf space.. I acquired a set of six Decible 5" 148-170mhz pass cavities(db4001-2) they will not tune tight enough on 145.310 they start losing Q at abt 148mhz can i modify the loops to move them down in freq??? or do i have to lengthen the tunable shunt also .... I cant find much info on mods on cavities...I can look at them on a spectrum analyzer but don't want to hack a good set of cavities then find it wont work.. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20391402</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:47:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
