<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: ATT &#x26; Starbucks in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20393871</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:42:51 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:42:51 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: ATT &#x26; Starbucks</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20395399</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/148516"><b>Authority</b></A> : Well agin, I think theyre currently just accepting both logins. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20395399</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:50:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ATT &#x26; Starbucks</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20394792</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/391339"><b>CampMaster</b></A> : Same here, the 3 SB's in OC I frequent have ATT up and running and works great!<br><br>~CMT<br><small>--<br>There's no place like 127.0.0.1<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20394792</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:02:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ATT &#x26; Starbucks</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20393871</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/148516"><b>Authority</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by Latte :</small><br><br>ATT wi-fi @ Starbucks has been working in various spots in Calif for several weeks for me:<br><br>-Laptop w/ wifi on, open browser, type in t-mobil.com. <br>-Page appears with T-Mobile log-in screen AND an AT&T login button.<br>-ATT login button opens window for sign-on with ATT dsl  account info.<br>-Your online.<br> </div>Ditto for me.  I don't know if the coming roll out is what we've already seen or a complete replacement of the current landing page.<br><br>I'm also very curious about wether they're replacing their back haul.  As I understand it the T-Mobile sites are currently served by expensive and relatively slow T1 connections.  As AT&T is also an ISP in a large part of the footprint one would think they'd use their own DSL lines.<br><br>I wonder why T-Mobile never used the Starbucks relationship to broaden their cellular footprint?  A pico-cell on every Starbucks would have gone a long way.  ;)<br><small>--<br>OS X on a PC?  Yup! &raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSx86" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSx86</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20393871</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:58:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ATT &#x26; Starbucks</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20391395</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : ATT wi-fi @ Starbucks has been working in various spots in Calif for several weeks for me:<br><br>-Laptop w/ wifi on, open browser, type in t-mobil.com. <br>-Page appears with T-Mobile log-in screen AND an AT&T login button.<br>-ATT login button opens window for sign-on with ATT dsl  account info.<br>-Your online.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20391395</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:45:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
