www.broadbandreports.com
  republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   AllHot TopicsCable SupportTelco SupportHardware etcSecurityClubsGallery»»






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T Southeast » AT&T U-Verse
 
Search Topic:
  Social:
topic feed
 
Posting
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
DSL Info Needed.. »
« Some questions about DSL deployment  
AuthorAll Replies


cokesat
Premium
join:2005-11-16
Cleveland, TN


edit:
April 27th, @10:11PM

reply to moonfish
Re: AT&T U-Verse

The house votes on the bill 4-28-08 HB1421

»www.legislature.state.tn.us/bill···r=HB1421

Will pass without a problem.


heels_fan
No Tag Needed
Premium
join:2003-02-07
Columbia, TN

said by cokesat See Profile :

The house votes on the bill 4-28-08 HB1421

»www.legislature.state.tn.us/bill···r=HB1421

Will pass without a problem.
Only because of the compromise between ATT and the others.


cokesat
Premium
join:2005-11-16
Cleveland, TN

said by heels_fan See Profile :

said by cokesat See Profile :

The house votes on the bill 4-28-08 HB1421

»www.legislature.state.tn.us/bill···r=HB1421

Will pass without a problem.
Only because of the compromise between ATT and the others.
What compromise is that???


heels_fan
No Tag Needed
Premium
join:2003-02-07
Columbia, TN

For one, ATT was planning on using the state wide franchise to build out into the more "profitable" areas of the state(Metro-Nashville, Memphis, etc* and not pay attention to the more rural area (Bon Aqua, Soddy Daisy, Mt Pleasant, ect)*

With the compromise, ATT will now hove to build out to a certain percentage of rural areas and in a certain amount of time.

*(These cities are used just for an example and are off the top of my head)

BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

reply to cokesat
said by cokesat See Profile :

said by heels_fan See Profile :

said by cokesat See Profile :

The house votes on the bill 4-28-08 HB1421

»www.legislature.state.tn.us/bill···r=HB1421

Will pass without a problem.
Only because of the compromise between ATT and the others.
What compromise is that???
The cable companies can get statewide franchises too. And at&t has to offer uverse to 30% of "poor" people by 2011

BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

reply to heels_fan
said by heels_fan See Profile :

For one, ATT was planning on using the state wide franchise to build out into the more "profitable" areas of the state(Metro-Nashville, Memphis, etc* and not pay attention to the more rural area (Bon Aqua, Soddy Daisy, Mt Pleasant, ect)*

With the compromise, ATT will now hove to build out to a certain percentage of rural areas and in a certain amount of time.

*(These cities are used just for an example and are off the top of my head)
If I was starting a business I think it would make sense to put franchises in areas that were more profitiable then spread out once the income flow started. So the hypcocrisy of this bothers me.

If I was going to open a chain of stores, I'd be damned if the state told me that I HAD to put 30% of my stores in areas where I was guaranteed to lose money.
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T SoutheastDSL Info Needed.. »
« Some questions about DSL deployment  

Most commented news this week
· [122] AT&T WhistleBlower Was Never Invited To Testify
· [53] Comcast Prepared To Spend Big On HD
· [52] Comcast's Use Of Twitter Continues To Fascinate
· [46] Sprint WiMax: Less Than $50
· [39] So Far, 'Franchise Reform' Means Higher Prices
· [31] U-Verse Launches In Tulsa
· [31] Apple Irked With Rogers iPhone Pricing?
· [31] Google: Bell Canada Is Breaking The Law
· [30] NebuAD Tries To Defuse Public Relations Nightmare
· [30] Apple Vs. Rogers: The Fight That Isn't
Wednesday, 09-Jul
01:49:53
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
8th year online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF