<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Raising Rates in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20400035</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:56:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:56:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20430057</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1075458"><b>majortom64</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  UncleDirtNap <A HREF="/useremail/u/1386995"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>>Want lower rates and more options write your representative and demand an end to forced bundling.<br> </div>Moving to <i>a la carte</i> channel selection will not decrease bills, it will just decrease choice. ESPN (one of the most expensive basic tier channels costs MSOs about $2-$2.50 per subscriber per month). Smaller channels that are bundled with that tier usually get under $0.30 per subscriber per month.<br><br>Consider a system with 100,000 subscribers. ESPN earns $200,000 (low end estimate) and small channels earn $30,000 a month. If cable companies are forced to offer <i>a la carte</i> pricing and 50% of subscribers decided that they did not want to pay for ESPN, Disney would either have to make less money (cutting all other costs of running this network) or raise its price. Given that those who wanted to keep ESPN are probably somewhat less price sensitive, doubling their price to make up their revenue shortfall is Disney's most likely response. That means, those subscribers who continue to receive ESPN, will pay more, either raising their overall bill or causing them to drop other channels to make up for it.<br><br>Smaller channels will be even more drastically affected. If they are not getting  bundled customers their prices will have to increase much more and many will just cease to exist.<br><br>/carmi]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20430057</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 13:10:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20404481</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1386995"><b>UncleDirtNap</b></A> : >Yeah well programming costs can only be absorbed for so long >before it has to be passed on.<br><br>Ahh blam Congress, especially the current crop of Democrat leaders who are raking in huge amounts of money from media and content providers for continuing to block efforts to end forced bundling.<br><br>Verizon and other "cable" operators are still being forced to carry channels, and pay the increasing costs, that nobody wants in order to get access to those we do and their competition like Comcast, Time Warner and other "cable" operators that have ownerships stakes in the content providing companies are reaping the benefits.<br><br>Want lower rates and more options write your representative and demand an end to forced bundling.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20404481</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:25:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20403242</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/927346"><b>Tzale</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  cwh <A HREF="/useremail/u/1357547"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>2 wire line tv, 2 sat tv and free OTA is probably about as much competition as you are going to get in a market.  That is 5 options on where to spend your money.  Not bad options if you ask me.<br> </div>I agree...<br><small>--<br>Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not true conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html" >www.usconstitution.net/const.html</A> <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20403242</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:08:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20402170</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1357547"><b>cwh</b></A> : 2 wire line tv, 2 sat tv and free OTA is probably about as much competition as you are going to get in a market.  That is 5 options on where to spend your money.  Not bad options if you ask me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20402170</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:26:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20402061</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1530301"><b>Corydon</b></A> : I'm sure they've figured out ways to roll out their service for less and less as time has gone by.<br><br>It also helps that population density in Verizon's footprint tends to be fairly high.<br><br>On the other hand, the fact that no other telco in the US has shown much interest in the FTTH model shows that there are still considerable risks to the business model (though on the other end, Qwest shows the risks of doing nothing at all).<br><small>--<br>My opinions are my own.  No-one else would want them!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20402061</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:01:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20401413</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/927346"><b>Tzale</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  nasadude <A HREF="/useremail/u/489959"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>and it will continue to get cheaper and cheaper to connect a subscriber, while the price for the service will get higher and higher.<br><br>wake up everyone, we are in a monopoly/duopoly situation; PRICES WILL NEVER GO DOWN AND THEY WILL ONLY BE STABLE OVER SHORT PERIODS OF TIME (3-6 months).<br><br>without competition, prices only go one way...UP<br> </div>Of course it is a semi-monopoly... Verizon has the best service available, they KNOW they can charge for it... However, I have seen the bandwidth / number of features increase in my area due to Verizon forcing the local cable co to really step up its game...<br><br>There IS competition, but just HOW MUCH competition is required to keep prices stable? I think it is a false hope to think more competition will keep prices lower... All these companies will just continue to raise prices when one takes the first jump.<br><br>-Tzale<br><small>--<br>Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not true conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html" >www.usconstitution.net/const.html</A> <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20401413</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:01:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400974</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : MAke that... I get 19 HD OTA channels with rabbit ears... only about 5 analog OTA<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400974</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:42:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400701</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/489959"><b>nasadude</b></A> : and it will continue to get cheaper and cheaper to connect a subscriber, while the price for the service will get higher and higher.<br><br>wake up everyone, we are in a monopoly/duopoly situation; PRICES WILL NEVER GO DOWN AND THEY WILL ONLY BE STABLE OVER SHORT PERIODS OF TIME (3-6 months).<br><br>without competition, prices only go one way...UP]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400701</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:50:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400387</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/927346"><b>Tzale</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Corydon <A HREF="/useremail/u/1530301"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>They just raised the rates as of January of this year, now three months later they are going up again? </div>No big surprise.  Someone has to pay for all of that fiber.  There was just an article about how it costs UTOPIA about $2300 to connect a subscriber.  I'm sure Verizon's costs are similar.<br><br>So there's no way that they're making their investment back fast enough to please Wall Street if your customers are only paying $100 a month.  That's two years to recover the cost to connect them and you haven't paid for any programming costs, HSI connectivity or telephony back-end.<br><br>This is why FiOS is considered a gamble, and why Verizon may well end up losing their shirt.<br> </div>It used to cost around $1500-3000/subscriber when they first started a few years ago... Recent estimates put the figure at $600-1000/subscriber passed.<br><br>-Tzale<br><small>--<br>Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not true conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html" >www.usconstitution.net/const.html</A> <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400387</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:00:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400384</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Fubar <A HREF="/useremail/u/320231"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  wifi4milez <A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  en102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Digital OTA looks better and better to me all the time.<br>So far, I've got 19 channels OTA on a pair of rabbit ears (50 dB gain though).  Only problem is that I don't get Fox or CBS.<br> </div>Well, get as much enjoyment out of it as you can now! The clock is ticking, and in less than 9 months it wont work anymore (Feb 2009 to be exact). <br> </div>Analog is going away... Digital OTA is here to stay<br> </div>Thats cool. I didnt even know there were two types of OTA! <br><small>--<br><b>&#1042;&#1077;&#1089;&#1085;&#1072; &#1087;&#1088;&#1080;&#1073;&#1099;&#1083;&#1072;</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400384</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:59:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400346</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1527764"><b>MrSpock29</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Corydon <A HREF="/useremail/u/1530301"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>They just raised the rates as of January of this year, now three months later they are going up again? </div>No big surprise.  Someone has to pay for all of that fiber.  There was just an article about how it costs UTOPIA about $2300 to connect a subscriber.  I'm sure Verizon's costs are similar.<br><br>So there's no way that they're making their investment back fast enough to please Wall Street if your customers are only paying $100 a month.  That's two years to recover the cost to connect them and you haven't paid for any programming costs, HSI connectivity or telephony back-end.<br><br>This is why FiOS is considered a gamble, and why Verizon may well end up losing their shirt.<br> </div>That opinion was once widely held a few years ago, when fios was first being rolled out, but it is not a widely shared opinion now. VZ (and all telcos) were always going to lose reg. phone customers, and they need to compete with cable. Now they can, with better infrastructure than cable. Considering their earnings were over a billion dollars this quarter alone, that is a long stretch from losing their shirt.<br>Further, with the stock up over $1 today, Wall Street is making their opinion known, although some of that is undoubtedly due to the wireless side. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400346</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:55:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400202</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1530301"><b>Corydon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>They just raised the rates as of January of this year, now three months later they are going up again? </div>No big surprise.  Someone has to pay for all of that fiber.  There was just an article about how it costs UTOPIA about $2300 to connect a subscriber.  I'm sure Verizon's costs are similar.<br><br>So there's no way that they're making their investment back fast enough to please Wall Street if your customers are only paying $100 a month.  That's two years to recover the cost to connect them and you haven't paid for any programming costs, HSI connectivity or telephony back-end.<br><br>This is why FiOS is considered a gamble, and why Verizon may well end up losing their shirt.<br><small>--<br>My opinions are my own.  No-one else would want them!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400202</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:27:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400089</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/726630"><b>JPuppy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  wifi4milez <A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  en102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Digital OTA looks better and better to me all the time.<br><br> </div>Well, get as much enjoyment out of it as you can now! The clock is ticking, and in less than 9 months it wont work anymore (Feb 2009 to be exact). <br> </div>He said digital OTA (ATSC), not analog (NTSC).<br><small>--<br>Only through the criticizing of others can we learn to love ourselves.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400089</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:09:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400085</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/320231"><b>Fubar</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  wifi4milez <A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  en102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Digital OTA looks better and better to me all the time.<br>So far, I've got 19 channels OTA on a pair of rabbit ears (50 dB gain though).  Only problem is that I don't get Fox or CBS.<br> </div>Well, get as much enjoyment out of it as you can now! The clock is ticking, and in less than 9 months it wont work anymore (Feb 2009 to be exact). <br> </div>Analog is going away... Digital OTA is here to stay]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400085</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:08:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400035</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  en102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Digital OTA looks better and better to me all the time.<br>So far, I've got 19 channels OTA on a pair of rabbit ears (50 dB gain though).  Only problem is that I don't get Fox or CBS.<br> </div>Well, get as much enjoyment out of it as you can now! The clock is ticking, and in less than 9 months it wont work anymore (Feb 2009 to be exact). <br><small>--<br><b>&#1042;&#1077;&#1089;&#1085;&#1072; &#1087;&#1088;&#1080;&#1073;&#1099;&#1083;&#1072;</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400035</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:02:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20399985</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/737475"><b>BosstonesOwn</b></A> : Yeah well programming costs can only be absorbed for so long before it has to be passed on.<br><br>Don't really know who u can blame for this.<br><small>--<br> "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20399985</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:55:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20399978</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : Digital OTA looks better and better to me all the time.<br>So far, I've got 19 channels OTA on a pair of rabbit ears (50 dB gain though).  Only problem is that I don't get Fox or CBS.<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20399978</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:53:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Raising Rates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20399954</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : They just raised the rates as of January of this year, now three months later they are going up again? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20399954</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:50:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
