<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: [Sprint] Samsung ACE vs Moto Q 9c in Cellphones, providers, and plans</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20405673</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:02:22 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:02:22 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [Sprint] Samsung ACE vs Moto Q 9c</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20405673</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/596312"><b>RobNyc</b></A> : I currently have the TOUCH. But the battery is mainly why I am selling it. I was previously thinking on the ACE but it looks a little to narrow, and Q9c has the best battery life out there. I was even thinking about the Treo 700wx but the 800 is coming out soon so we'll see because the 700wx is a bit on the large size. The Mogul ah well, too big for my taste and i don't like the whole idea of sliding keyboard to be able to type. <br><br>Right now I been thinking as well as crazyska about the Q9c, or blackberry curve when it comes out (depending on charges and battery life) till Raphael (Mogul successor comes out)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20405673</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:51:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Sprint] Samsung ACE vs Moto Q 9c</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20405242</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874778"><b>cvrefugee</b></A> : I went with the Q9c because of the extended battery, unlocked GPS (works great with Google Maps/Windows Live), cheaper price, and the promised upgrade to Windows Mobile 6.1.  My only gripes with the phone is the semi-sluggish interface (may be fixed with the upcoming update this summer) and dust under the screen.  I also looked at the Blackberry Pearl but I couldn't see myself paying an extra $30/month for the BIS, plus the SureType looked like crap.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20405242</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:38:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Sprint] Samsung ACE vs Moto Q 9c</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20403561</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/596312"><b>RobNyc</b></A> : I am also on the same boat ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20403561</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:43:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[Sprint] Samsung ACE vs Moto Q 9c</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20402542</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141054"><b>crazyska</b></A> : IM trying to decide which one to go with? any thoughts advice for people that have these? which one is better?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20402542</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:46:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
