<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: It&#x27;s my computer, in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20406675</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:03:09 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:03:09 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: It&#x27;s my computer,</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20406675</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  bgraham <A HREF="/useremail/u/344426"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>and my bandwidth and in my house, so I think I can do anything I like. If I want to have software that blocks ads and delete cookies that's my choice.<br><br>I really don't see what the issue is here.<br> </div>you dont seem to have read up on this new (unlawful in the UK/EU without a court order or consent of both partys (the user and the website owner))use for deep packet inspection (DPI) hardware on the ISP network.<br><br>dont you care about your auto copyright protected datastream, or for 3rd partys to profit from your data property, without a single penny or contract coming to you for its use as you see fit?.<br><br> how about your privacy when using web based email for yourself or your family , they can see all that http based data etc.<br><br>blocking the cookies will NOT stop your full datastream being intercepted or collected, for processing and later anonymising of any your data they deem valuble to them.<br><br>its the total oposite of the usual cookie use.<br><br>the simple answer is to read these links for a true non PR written news copy tech/legal view.<br><br> its known that Phorm use layer7/Deep Packet Inspection kit to intercept and collect _all_ your data stream regardless of what data they then process and act upon, anonymise etc.<br><br>and in the UK/EU that is unlawful without court orders for far more acurate detail's and the real feeling in this see:<br><br>the longest Phorm related thread on the net, and legal/moral/tech comments by the very paying UK customers effected by this unlawful interception.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/12/33628733-virgin-media-phorm-webwise-adverts-updated.html" >www.cableforum.co.uk/board/12/33&middot;&middot;&middot;ted.html</A><br><br>The Phorm ???Webwise??? System - a Legal Analysis<br>Nicholas Bohm<br>23rd April 2008<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.fipr.org/080423phormlegal.pdf" >www.fipr.org/080423phormlegal.pdf</A><br><br>FIPR (the official advisor body to the UK Govt)calls on Home Office to withdraw misleading advice on Phorm.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2008/04/23/fipr-calls-on-home-office-to-withdraw-misleading-advice-on-phorm/" >www.openrightsgroup.org/2008/04/&middot;&middot;&middot;n-phorm/</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/" >www.openrightsgroup.org/</A><br><br>the many ElReg news coverage <br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/24/home_office_phorm_fipr_bt/page2.html" >www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/24&middot;&middot;&middot;ge2.html</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/29/phorm_roundup/" >www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/29&middot;&middot;&middot;roundup/</A><br><br>to get you started...<br><br>thanks, David M]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20406675</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:39:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>It&#x27;s my computer,</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20404766</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/344426"><b>bgraham</b></A> : and my bandwidth and in my house, so I think I can do anything I like. If I want to have software that blocks ads and delete cookies that's my choice.<br><br>I really don't see what the issue is here.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20404766</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:15:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
