<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Upconverting AAC files in Audio/Video Chat</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20409114</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:55:48 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:55:48 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Upconverting AAC files</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20411333</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1346679"><b>AB</b></A> : You can convert almost anything, any way. Will it sound better? That's for you to decide, I suppose.<br><br>For changing formats there's SUPER or Audacity, or any number of other programs.<br><br>Audacity: &raquo;<A HREF="http://audacity.sourceforge.net/" >audacity.sourceforge.net/</A><br><br>SUPER: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html" >www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20411333</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:42:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Upconverting AAC files</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409260</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/379093"><b>rusdi</b></A> : Now, to introduce something that will <strong>REALLY</strong> confuse & befuddle you! ;)<br><br>VBR, (Variable Bit Rate). :)<br><br>Something I use lately, exclusively. <br><br>"LAME" encoder. <br><br>It uses an algorithm that assigns bit-rate to frequencies that the human ear is less apt to hear, @ a lower bitrate, and then, instantly assigns bit-rates to those frequencies that are more pronounced, a higher bit-rate. :)<br><br>This results in a file that's normally lower file size, yet retains the areas where sound quality is most likely required for even those folks that can REALLY hear the difference! :D<br><br>My son says he can hear the difference between a virgin "WAVE" rip, and a 128 bit rip. <br><br>I can't, but my ears are twenty years older than his! :D<br><br>Also, you should be using a player, that can accurately re-produce the AAC, MP3 or WAVE.<br><br>I use WinAmp. Mostly 'cause I can play ANYTHING with it. WMP sometimes is persnickitty 'bout what it will "allow" you to play.<br><small>--<br>F@H console client<br>Come fold for a cure with us.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409260</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:14:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Upconverting AAC files</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409114</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/379093"><b>rusdi</b></A> : An example is, if you "rip" a CD @ 320 bitrate, then compress the 320 to 128, the 128 bitrate is obviously lower, and subsequently, lower sound quality. If you then re-encode the 128 back up to 320 bitrate, it will only sound as good as the 128 bitrate encoding sounded....clear as mud? ;)<br><small>--<br>F@H console client<br>Come fold for a cure with us.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409114</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:01:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Upconverting AAC files</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409111</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/379093"><b>rusdi</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jlanci <A HREF="/useremail/u/1255484"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>So then in theory you could never go higher than CD quality audio which is what 128kbps wav format... i think??<br><br>So for example you cannot rip a CD at 256kbps and hear any difference because the source is still encoded at 128kbps?<br><br> </div>No "theory". That's exactly right!<br><br>You can re-encode a 128 bitrate tune @ a higher encoded bitrate, however it can't be higher quality sound, than the original 128 bitrate sound...you do in fact understand. :)<br><small>--<br>F@H console client<br>Come fold for a cure with us.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409111</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:58:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Upconverting AAC files</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409099</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1255484"><b>jlanci</b></A> : So then in theory you could never go higher than CD quality audio which is what 128kbps wav format... i think??<br><br>So for example you cannot rip a CD at 256kbps and hear any difference because the source is still encoded at 128kbps?<br><br>Am I correct or is there a way to repair the damage done during compression and guess at the missing information to bring it back up to full quality.  I know this can be done with photos.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409099</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:52:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Upconverting AAC files</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409057</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/379093"><b>rusdi</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jlanci <A HREF="/useremail/u/1255484"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It's like once you compress you're stuck.<br> </div>PREZACTALLY! :)<br><br>Once the compression is done. You can never recover the final rendition to its original pristine sound.<br><br>Hate to be the "bearer of sad news", but you just described the situation perfectly. :)<br><small>--<br>F@H console client<br>Come fold for a cure with us.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409057</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:39:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Upconverting AAC files</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409047</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1255484"><b>jlanci</b></A> : Ok, so are you then saying that you cannot re-encode at a higher bitrate?  It seems odd to me that you can always compress but you can't go the opposite way.  It's like once you compress you're stuck.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409047</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:35:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Upconverting AAC files</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409030</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/379093"><b>rusdi</b></A> : Don't think anything can be done to enhance the quality of the original encoding, regardless of the final out-put rendering.<br><br>MP3, AAC is...what it is. A "compressed" data stream. Not unlike compressing video.<br><br>ANY TIME an original digital capture is "compressed", audio, or video, it loses some quality. <br><br>Sometimes it's clearly audible, sometimes only by the most discernible audiophiles.  :huh:<br><br>The more "Bitrate" you start out with, the better the sound/video quality. This is an unavoidable truth.<br><small>--<br>F@H console client<br>Come fold for a cure with us.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20409030</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:28:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Upconverting AAC files</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20408965</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1255484"><b>jlanci</b></A> : Not sure if this has been posted here before but here goes.<br><br>I have a bunch of music in iTunes that is in AAC format (non-DRM).  I would like to upconvert them to sound better.  Not sure how to do this.<br><br>For example:<br><br>Can I just up the bitrate on them? Or should I convert them to .wav format and up the bitrate in the process.  <br><br>I'm not sure if this is at all possible or if it will even make a difference in the sound quality of my music.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20408965</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:59:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
