d_l
Barsoom
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-08
Reno, NV
| reply to koma3504
Re: Ongoing AT&T DNS server problems?
Nameserver Response Time (ms)
min/avg/max/stdev/retries
4.2.2.1 17.01/20.22/24.45/2.95/0
4.2.2.2 16.34/17.98/22.49/2.28/0
66.218.44.5 17.01/20.33/24.50/3.33/0
66.218.44.90 18.04/20.90/25.09/3.21/0
66.51.206.100 25.78/27.18/31.74/2.29/0
66.51.205.100 64.88/82.86/144.06/30.70/0
208.67.222.222 16.49/18.70/21.68/2.18/0
208.67.220.220 16.65/17.80/21.43/1.83/0
»SBC DSL FAQ »How do I test DNS lookup latency with ns_bench?
Do you have a software firewall that is blocking adns operation? |
|
koma3504
Advocate
Premium
join:2004-06-22
North Richland Hills, TX | Well zone alarm ask permission and i give it. |
|
David
Last man standing
Premium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
clubs: | You guys still having problems with DNS? Post a tracert to the DNS and let's take a look.
Also the NS_bench is a good test too. |
|
deblin
Dark Side of the Moon
Premium,MVM
join:2001-09-01
Middletown, DE
 ·Verizon FIOS
 ·Comcast Workplace
 ·DSL EXTREME
| reply to koma3504
said by koma3504  :Well zone alarm ask permission and i give it. I'm not familiar with zone alarm, but have you tried (temporarily) disabling it entirely? How do you "allow" ns_bench.exe to work? Do you specifically allow the binary, which allows all access, or do you specify a specific port/ports? If so, make sure you are allowing udp port 53, NOT tcp. Although the DNS protocol will fall back on tcp for large queries, the queries ns_bench is performing are going to use udp, not tcp.
--
Hello...is there anybody in there? |
|
