<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Beat My Download Speed!!! in Qwest</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20418592</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:11:31 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:11:31 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20450638</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/621958"><b>AthlGrond</b></A> : Ah! Thanks. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20450638</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 10:08:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20450037</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1512705"><b>CopperMonkey</b></A> : It wasn't clear, but my point, aside from that they do use the Qwest Metropolitan Optical Ethernet network for the 12 and 20 meg tiers, was that in lower speed tiers they don't HAVE to use ATM. They just choose to.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20450037</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 06:07:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20442803</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/621958"><b>AthlGrond</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  CopperMonkey <A HREF="/useremail/u/1512705"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  AthlGrond <A HREF="/useremail/u/621958"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Qwest supports PPPoE on their regular DSL offerings, the PPPoE info just gets encapsulated by ATM. (Using PPPoE does not guarantee that ATM isn't also used.)</div>Then it would be the other way around for Verizon/AT&T, right?</div>I'm not saying that they don't use PPPoE without ATM (I don't know if they do or don't), my point was that their use of PPPoE doesn't rule out their use of ATM which if I understood you correctly was your point (that the use of PPPoE proves that they don't use ATM).<br><small>--<br>"You are technically correct. The best kind of correct." -Bureaucrat 1.0</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20442803</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:18:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20442323</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1512705"><b>CopperMonkey</b></A> : Yes, that's been noted on the previous page by ewth8tr, whom I noticed you had replied to; seems he's right on the money.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  AthlGrond <A HREF="/useremail/u/621958"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Qwest supports PPPoE on their regular DSL offerings, the PPPoE info just gets encapsulated by ATM. (Using PPPoE does not guarantee that ATM isn't also used.)</div>Then it would be the other way around for Verizon/AT&T, right?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20442323</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:37:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20439114</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/238045"><b>adsldude</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  dynodb <A HREF="/useremail/u/993987"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>ADSL is based around ATM- therefore the protocol on the local loop between your modem and the DSLAM remains the same no matter if the DSLAM is ATM or ethernet fed. </div>This article looks like it applies to what is going on behind the DSLAM on the network facing side.  ATM can co-exist or be replaced by Metro Ethernet:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www1.alcatel-lucent.com/bnd/app_notes/Aggr_DSLoEth_an.pdf" >www1.alcatel-lucent.com/bnd/app_&middot;&middot;&middot;h_an.pdf</A><br><br>Does the article fit what Qwest is beginning to deploy?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20439114</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:49:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20438945</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/621958"><b>AthlGrond</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  CopperMonkey <A HREF="/useremail/u/1512705"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It doesn't have to be ATM, though. IIRC Verizon and AT&T have used PPPoE in the past for their ADSL, they might still do so but I could be mistaken.<br> </div>Qwest supports PPPoE on their regular DSL offerings, the PPPoE info just gets encapsulated by ATM. (Using PPPoE does not guarantee that ATM isn't also used.)<br><small>--<br>"You are technically correct. The best kind of correct." -Bureaucrat 1.0</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20438945</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:18:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20438403</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1512705"><b>CopperMonkey</b></A> : It doesn't have to be ATM, though. IIRC Verizon and AT&T have used PPPoE in the past for their ADSL, they might still do so but I could be mistaken.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20438403</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 06:36:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20436291</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/993987"><b>dynodb</b></A> : ADSL is based around ATM- therefore the protocol on the local loop between your modem and the DSLAM remains the same no matter if the DSLAM is ATM or ethernet fed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20436291</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:59:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20436118</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1512705"><b>CopperMonkey</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  AthlGrond <A HREF="/useremail/u/621958"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>If I understand it correctly they don't run a fiber line directly to your NID like Verizon does with FIOS.  That part (the part from their fiber network to your house) is still DSL (ADSL2+) and still uses ATM.<br><br>Or do I have it all wrong?</div>DSL doesn't function if your NID is connected by fiber. For what reason I can't remember myself, but to quote the howstuffworks site; "ADSL signals can't pass through the conversion from analog to digital and back to analog that occurs if a portion of your telephone circuit comes through fiber-optic cables."<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  djweis <A HREF="/useremail/u/1346063"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The twisted pair to the DSLAM on an ADSL circuit will always be ATM. If it's not ATM it's not ADSL. After it hits the DSLAM it can be either ethernet, ATM, frame relay, or something else.</div>I thought they ran fiber all the way up to the DSLAM/RT for the new tiers (and even the 7Mbps tier). It doesn't have to be ATM if the DSLAM/RT is fiber fed, if I'm not mistaken, and I would imagine they would avoid ATM if they could. In short they shouldn't have to run ATM for the new speed tiers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20436118</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:29:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435304</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/621958"><b>AthlGrond</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  djweis <A HREF="/useremail/u/1346063"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The twisted pair to the DSLAM on an ADSL circuit will always be ATM. If it's not ATM it's not ADSL. After it hits the DSLAM it can be either ethernet, ATM, frame relay, or something else.</div>Well, that's what I thought was the case. That's why I thought that there would be ATM overhead.<br><br>I really don't understand how this would be better than being connected to a CO (or a fiber fed RT) with their previous offerings, as far as overhead is concerned.<br><small>--<br>"You are technically correct. The best kind of correct." -Bureaucrat 1.0</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435304</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:00:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435205</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1346063"><b>djweis</b></A> : The twisted pair to the DSLAM on an ADSL circuit will always be ATM. If it's not ATM it's not ADSL. After it hits the DSLAM it can be either ethernet, ATM, frame relay, or something else.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435205</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:44:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20425524</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/238045"><b>adsldude</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  ewth8tr <A HREF="/useremail/u/1183695"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Qwest's new FTTN service runs off of the Qwest Metropolitan Optical Ethernet network instead of through an ATM.</div>Is that part of the reason why the only ADSL2+ ISP is qwest.net at this time?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20425524</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 11:19:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20424581</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/621958"><b>AthlGrond</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  ewth8tr <A HREF="/useremail/u/1183695"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Qwest's new FTTN service runs off of the Qwest Metropolitan Optical Ethernet network instead of through an ATM.</div>So ADSL2+ doesn't use ATM, it uses Qwest Metropolitan Optical Ethernet?<br><br>[Edit]<br>To put it another way: What underlying data-transport protocol have they replaced ATM with in the ADSL2+ part of this setup? Is there one?<br><br><small>--<br>"You are technically correct. The best kind of correct." -Bureaucrat 1.0</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20424581</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:01:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20424452</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1545475"><b>orange</b></A> : It might just be plain inaccurate. IIRC the only "really" accurate way is to use wget and measure it that way with a 64MB (or so) test file.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20424452</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:04:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20423280</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1183695"><b>ewth8tr</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  orange <A HREF="/useremail/u/1545475"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>No idea how you got such good speeds, but that's awesome. (I think the test may be inaccurate though.)<br><br>IIRC Qwest's higher speed offering is 20mbps/1mbps - can someone tell me if that's correct or not? :)<br> </div>That's the fastest DSL speed qwest offers. I'm guessing that speedtest is coming from a Qwest sales office in Logan.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20423280</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:09:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20423276</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1183695"><b>ewth8tr</b></A> : Qwest's new FTTN service runs off of the Qwest Metropolitan Optical Ethernet network instead of through an ATM. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20423276</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:08:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20422148</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1545475"><b>orange</b></A> : No idea how you got such good speeds, but that's awesome. (I think the test may be inaccurate though.)<br><br>IIRC Qwest's higher speed offering is 20mbps/1mbps - can someone tell me if that's correct or not? :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20422148</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:04:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420998</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1278238"><b>questionable</b></A> : HOLY!!<br><br>nice speeds would love to know what you have. <br><br>We have a winner!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420998</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 12:05:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420793</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/159054"><b>brmasha</b></A> : ok, from qwest in northern utah.<br><small>--<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/20420793?c=1303326&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMDQxODU5Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="14103 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=322 HEIGHT=173 SRC="/r0/download/1303326~ef7144fcf4ee32e3be3c18131deef7d2/speedtest.jpg"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420793</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:27:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420745</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/621958"><b>AthlGrond</b></A> : If I understand it correctly they don't run a fiber line directly to your NID like Verizon does with FIOS.  That part (the part from their fiber network to your house) is still DSL (ADSL2+) and still uses ATM.<br><br>Or do I have it all wrong?<br><small>--<br>"You are technically correct. The best kind of correct." -Bureaucrat 1.0</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420745</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:19:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420740</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1545475"><b>orange</b></A> : Exactly what I thought. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420740</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:17:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420630</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1434251"><b>smithers8</b></A> : the overhead comes from an ATM network, the fiber backbone should be more efficient]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420630</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:56:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420482</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1545475"><b>orange</b></A> : Yeah, I'm pretty sure.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420482</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:24:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420479</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/621958"><b>AthlGrond</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  orange <A HREF="/useremail/u/1545475"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>2. Someone with Qwest's 20mbps/1mbps service will come and beat both your download and upload speeds.</div>Considering DSL's overhead, will the 20,000/1,000 service be able to beat a 16,206/731 test result?<br><small>--<br>"You are technically correct. The best kind of correct." -Bureaucrat 1.0</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420479</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:22:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420379</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/742449"><b>MikeStammer</b></A> : im on quest ftth here in UT and my numbers are usually high 8's down and 1.5 or so up.  downloads usually hold around 1.5 MB/sec tho, which is nice! =)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420379</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:02:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420268</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1278238"><b>questionable</b></A> : If i could get the 20/1 I'd post it]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20420268</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 09:34:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20419712</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/671546"><b>Vin DSL</b></A> : LoL!   :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20419712</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:48:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20419605</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1545475"><b>orange</b></A> : Well,<br><br>1. You're in the wrong forum (as the other poster said).<br><br>2. Someone with Qwest's 20mbps/1mbps service will come and beat both your download and upload speeds.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20419605</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:22:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20419371</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Are you on RR? Well even if you are in the wrong forum soon some will beat those speeds. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20419371</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:27:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Beat My Download Speed!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20418592</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I have an uber crappy computer but sicks connections speeds i live in ohio and ran the test in other states and still rocked it out this is my results page CHECK IT OUT!!<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net/result/265976462.png" >www.speedtest.net/result/265976462.png</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20418592</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:50:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
