<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>! in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20421831</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:08:30 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:08:30 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20421831</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1547643"><b>HEDP</b></A> : Makes me wonder if the whole net neutrality debate had somehow an objective to buy more time for the companies to upgrade their networks while still deploying 4G services as a means of prioritizing traffic between wireless and land.<br><br>This will be a massive undertaking, even with microwave equipment. No company no matter it's resources will have a hard time deploying 4G. This could of as aa reason for Verizon to introduce FIOS, because those very same fiber links could be the backhaul for their wireless services.<br><br>The limitation of copper is also little with DOCSIS. The 4G Utopia is occuring at a time when the economy is not as stable as it used to be.<br><br>This will cost companies trillions of dollars to just to upgrade to 4G, but this upgrade is probably the most significant as well.<br><br>P.S Posting this while traveling on a bus at 85mph from 29 Palms, CA to Los Angeles, CA on my Sprint EVDO connection with is considered 3G technology. A nice 137KB/sec steady 75ms latency stream as I download a few updates.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20421831</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:01:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
