 nasadude
join:2001-10-05 Rockville, MD
·Comcast
1 edit | reply to vpoko Re: I'd like to know
I might have exaggerated when I said "no correlation", but here is the data:
»www.oecd.org/sti/ict/broadband
data released June '07; go to item 3a for the spreadsheet.
a correlation of 0.24 is pretty low; in addition, note that there are 6 countries ahead of the U.S. with lower pop density, in some cases, much lower (US = 32, Canada =3.3)
penetration per 100 inhabitants/Pop. density Denmark 34.3 /126.1 Netherlands 33.5 /400.5 Switzerland 30.7 /183.0 Korea 29.9 /484.9 Norway 29.8 /14.4 Iceland 29.8 /3.0 Finland 28.8 /15.6 Sweden 28.6 /20.2 Canada 25.0 /3.3 Belgium 23.8 /345.8 United Kingdom 23.7 /247.3 Australia 22.7 /2.7 France 22.5 /115.1 Luxembourg 22.2 /181.8 United States 22.1 /32.0 Japan 21.3 /338.2 Germany 21.2 /230.8 Austria 18.6 /98.7 Correlation: 0.24 |
|
  vpoko Premium join:2003-07-03 Jamaica Plain, MA
| That's some pretty good data, certainly shows there are problems beyond population density. But I would say the data is still flawed. Countries like Canada and Australia have populated regions, and they have areas where nobody lives. In the US, on the other hand, most remote areas still have some population. In other words, there's a lot of dead mass. |
|