Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Tech and Talk » Technical » Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews » [hard drive] New HD capacity is way less than the specs on N
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
2790
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
does this IRQ look right?!? »
« Need to build new gaming Machine  
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


marti
Color outside the lines
Premium,MVM
join:2001-12-14
Houston, TX
clubs:


1 edit
[hard drive] New HD capacity is way less than the specs on N

I just received WD Caviar SE16 WD3200AAKS 320GB. HD details (»www.newegg.com/product/product.a···22136074). In Windows (disk management) the drive is shown as 298.09.

I can understand a little space for "overhead," but over 20 GB? (thanks)
--
Team Discovery


dbmaven
There's no shortage
Premium,Mod
join:1999-10-26
Sty in Sky
clubs:
Re: [hard drive] New HD capasity is way less than the specs on N

320 really = 305.
Windows adds about 7 in overhead.

The math here still applies.


seaquake
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-23
Millersville, MD
clubs:
·Verizon FIOS

reply to marti
Or more simply stated, HD manufacturers consider 1MB to be 1,000,000 KB. In reality, a MB is 1,024,000 KB. Once you start getting into the multi-gigabyte range the discrepancy is quite large. I wish they'd stop using incorrect numbers cause it does stink.

It reminds me of the days when a 19" CRT was actually 17.5 to 18.1"; they reported the corner to corner of the bezel, not the screen.


Cabal
Premium
join:2007-01-21
Boston, MA

Chances are good it says somewhere on the drive or box exactly how many bytes are present in the drive (320,000,000,000). Chances are even better that your drive manufacturer is the correct one, and your OS is incorrectly telling you 298.09 GB when it means 298.09 GiB.
--
Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?


marti
Color outside the lines
Premium,MVM
join:2001-12-14
Houston, TX
clubs:

reply to marti
Thanks guys. The HD is installed, so can't look and see what it says on the label.

I can live with size, as it is in an external case for backups and such, but I do think the "math" should add up!
--
Team Discovery


Ken Peterson
Premium
join:2000-12-08
reply to marti
Yeah, when I recently plopped a 1 TB drive in my PVR PC, it was more like 936GB. As said above, like the old CRT diagonal measurements, or like the old motorcycles back in the '70s. A 350cc bike was really a 325cc machine!


boogietillyapuke
B.O.H.I.C.A.
Premium
join:2000-09-14
On Da' Edge

reply to marti
Seagate 320 internal=298
Seagate 320 External=298
Seagate 320 Internal with linux installed, as I can't see it in windows, I'm gonna take a SWAG and say.......298.
--
Piss Poor Planning On Your Part, Doesn't Constitute an Emergency On Mine.


signmeuptoo
Folding and Crunching Not just Breakfast
Premium
join:2001-11-22
LOSTinSpace
clubs:
·Future Nine Corpor..
·AT&T Southeast

reply to marti
I don't see what the big deal is. It's been this was since the beginning. If you buy computer stuff, understanding the math behind it is just part of the deal.

I agree that they should note the formatted capacity, in inclusion, but it isn't like this is something new or earth shattering.
--
You know your life has gotten "DICEY" when it turns into an episode of LOST, like my ex wife, who I swear is one of "The Others". Cancer and other diseases kill fellow members here at DSLR! Easy: Join us in Teams Helix and Discovery to save the world!


koolman2
Premium
join:2002-10-01
Anchorage, AK
·GCI.net

reply to marti

500 GB drive
Take a look at the drive properties and you should find that your drive has about 320,000,000,000 bytes. See my attachment for an example.
--
Now typed solely on DSK (Dvorak Simplified Keyboard).

severach

join:2002-09-12
Jackson, MI

reply to marti
A Kilobyte can be 1000 or 1024. A Megabyte can be 1000*1000, 1000*1024, or 1024*1024. When a Megabyte is reduced so that "MB" can be written afterwards it can be by any of those factors. Software authors and advertisers choose whatever seems most appropriate.

The current definition for the Megabyte that hard drive makers use is 1000*1000 which is the smallest possible value that can still be called a Megabyte. It needs to be that way for advertising or we'd get wars about "My Megabyte is bigger than your Megabyte."

floydb_1982

join:2004-08-25
Kent, WA
·Clearwire Wireless
·Comcast

 reply to marti
Let me point out that a floppy disk unformatted is 2 megabytes but when formatted it come out to 1.38 megabytes witch is = to 1.44 megabytes. Another example would be my external 500 gigabyte hard drive. The computer reads the space as 465 gigabytes witch is = to 500,105,216,000 bytes. Do you understand what I am trying to say here? Newegg is not lying at all. In fact why should you blame Newegg the information they post about each of the hardware they sell comes direct from the manufacture. So if you feel miss led then go to the manufactures website and complain to them and not Newegg.

trog

join:2001-03-25
Scarborough, ON
reply to marti
From the WD website
SATA Hard Drives 320 GB
Formatted capacity 320,072 MB
User sectors per drive 625,142,448

Sector size 512

625,142,448 * 512 / (1024*1024*1024) = 320072933376 / 1073741824
= 298.09


deblin
Dark Side of the Moon
Premium,MVM
join:2001-09-01
Middletown, DE

reply to seaquake
said by seaquake See Profile :

Or more simply stated, HD manufacturers consider 1MB to be 1,000,000 KB. In reality, a MB is 1,024,000 KB.
Actually, it's 1024*1024 or 1,048,576 KB. The same applies going to GiB: 1024*1024*1024, or 1073741824.

Assuming no filesystem formatting/MBR/boot sector/etc, the size of a drive is:

advertised_size * 1000 * 1000 * 1000 / 1024 / 1024 / 1024

or

adv_size / 1.073741824

So yeah, roughly 7.4% is "lost" due to the way hard drive manufacturers calculate the available space.
--
Hello...is there anybody in there?


aurgathor

join:2002-12-01
Lynnwood, WA
reply to marti
From a drive's box: "A gigabyte (GB ) means 1 billion bytes"


deblin
Dark Side of the Moon
Premium,MVM
join:2001-09-01
Middletown, DE
Yup, and gigabyte != gibibyte.


Sandman5
Premium
join:2002-07-10
Brookline, MO
clubs:

reply to signmeuptoo
said by signmeuptoo See Profile :

I don't see what the big deal is. It's been this was since the beginning. If you buy computer stuff, understanding the math behind it is just part of the deal.
I think part of the problem is that as drives get bigger, it seems like we're losing more space.
--
Rule #62: Don't take yourself so damn seriously!


deblin
Dark Side of the Moon
Premium,MVM
join:2001-09-01
Middletown, DE

said by Sandman5 See Profile :

I think part of the problem is that as drives get bigger, it seems like we're losing more space.
:)
--
Hello...is there anybody in there?


Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Time Warner Cable
·Time Warner VOIP

reply to severach
said by severach See Profile :

A Kilobyte can be 1000 or 1024. A Megabyte can be 1000*1000, 1000*1024, or 1024*1024. When a Megabyte is reduced so that "MB" can be written afterwards it can be by any of those factors. Software authors and advertisers choose whatever seems most appropriate.

The current definition for the Megabyte that hard drive makers use is 1000*1000 which is the smallest possible value that can still be called a Megabyte. It needs to be that way for advertising or we'd get wars about "My Megabyte is bigger than your Megabyte."
but they should say 935GB and not 1TB


bigunk
Gort, Klattu Birada Nikto

join:2001-02-10
Santa Clarita, CA
reply to deblin
I guess I'll dig out a few of my 20G drives so I will still have lots of space to spare. I just threw out my last 120MB Seagate RLL drive.

eugenegill

join:2004-05-05
Greenville, SC
·Charter Pipeline
·VoicePulse

reply to severach
said by severach See Profile :

A Kilobyte can be 1000 or 1024."
Not really true. See »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibi#IEC_s···prefixes
Thread is
Forums » Tech and Talk » Technical » Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviewsdoes this IRQ look right?!? »
« Need to build new gaming Machine  
page: 1 · 2


Sunday, 29-Nov 23:33:56 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [81] Weekend Open Thread
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [79] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [41] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· [NFL] Week 12 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· sysguard2010.com [Security]
· [ Classes] Druid tanking: rotation and glyphs [World of Warcraft]