 Thermo1223
join:2001-12-20 Allentown, PA
edit: May 3rd, @01:42PM
| [speed/latency] Upload always 100%, DL not even close.
So I got DSL 3360/864 in my apt.
Cable never seemed to work right so I figure I give VZ a try.
Well I get wild fluctuations of my download speed, but upload is always rock solid. I figure and ask what the general consensus here is before calling VZ back out.
It is on a DSL only phone line, I use VOIP.
Here are the stats:
Transceiver Revision: 7.2.3.0 Vendor ID Code: 4 Line Mode: G.DMT Mode Data Path: Fast
Transceiver Information Downstream Path Upstream Path DSL Speed (Kbits/Sec) 3360 864 Margin (dB) 20.0 15.0 Line Attenuation (dB) 29.5 16.5 Transmit Power (dBm) 12.9 11.9
Update here is a recent line quality test: »/linequality/nil/2380203 |
|
 Thermo1223
join:2001-12-20 Allentown, PA | I also have already done a tweak test and check out fine. |
|
 tlbepson Premium join:2002-02-09 Reston, VA
| reply to Thermo1223 >>Well I get wild fluctuations of my download speed, but upload is always rock solid. I figure and ask what the general consensus here is before calling VZ back out.
How wild is "wild"? Different sites will download at different speeds.
Are you seeing significantly different download speeds for the same site or is each site (fairly) consistent if you do the same download from the same site--I'd try it by downloading from the same site multiple times but to different directories.
If the download speed is fairly consistent for the same download, then that's basically just the speed that's been "set" for the site--if not, then you may have a problem...
Hope that helps...
Terrie |
|
  Jodokast96 R.I.P Bassman442 Premium join:2005-11-23 Erial, NJ
·Verizon Online DSL
| reply to Thermo1223 said by Thermo1223 :I also have already done a tweak test and check out fine. Run another one and post a link to the results page if you could. |
|
 Thermo1223
join:2001-12-20 Allentown, PA
| reply to Thermo1223 Also my past test history, great dl's one day the next blah.
»/testhistory/543615/c9079
Recent test, why the retransmissions?
»/tweakr/block:···terpppoe |
|
  Jodokast96 R.I.P Bassman442 Premium join:2005-11-23 Erial, NJ
·Verizon Online DSL
| My guess is Verizon runs your connection through a Juniper router (on their end). The re-transmissions cause unstable speeds. One more thing you can do to verify it is to run a speed test from »www.speakeasy.net/speedtest. Run one to NY and another to LA (or SF or SEA). You will most likely see good speeds from the West Coast servers and bad ones to the NY server. If so, it is indeed a Juniper.
What you need to do to get around this is download DrTcp (from the Tools section here) and change your Recieve Window (RWIN) to 13068. Save, exit, and reboot. You should now see much better speeds to the NY server. You will lose about half the speed to the West Coast, but your connection will now be stable throughout as the re-transmissions should be gone. |
|
 Thermo1223
join:2001-12-20 Allentown, PA
| Well here is another kicker, I lugged an old (circa 2002) Westell Wirespeed home from work and I get my rated dl speed no matter what. I seriously don't get it.
It obviously isn't a Verizon only problem because I would have had the same result. |
|
 Bytebender Bytebender
join:2008-02-12 Canada
| said by Thermo1223 : ... Westell Wirespeed home from work and I get my rated dl speed no matter what...It obviously isn't a Verizon only problem because I would have had the same result. So, when using the Wirespeed modem, your up/dn numbers are always good ? If so it's a fair bet the other modem was a contributing factor, if there's a firmware update available, that might help out. -- reboot, reset, reconfigure, then recycle. |
|
 Thermo1223
join:2001-12-20 Allentown, PA | reply to Thermo1223 Is this the lastest firmware?
VER:4.04.03.00
That is what is on the Versalink.
Yes the Wirespeed works 100%, which 100%(or close) speed. |
|
 Bytebender Bytebender
join:2008-02-12 Canada | I believe that is the newest. Hopefully that 327 is still under warranty then ... -- reboot, reset, reconfigure, then recycle. |
|