Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » O Canada! » Canadian » Canadian Broadband » [Rant] Legalities of ISP packet sniffing
Uniqs:
475
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
3web can't connect »
« Lobbying on 'net throttling' heads to Hill  
HDgeorge

join:2008-05-03
Vancouver, BC

[Rant] Legalities of ISP packet sniffing

Many ISPs are deploying packet sniffing software to throttle traffic. I wonder what the legal implications are in such. Could this be a form of wire tapping. Does my packet have a right to privacy? A packet is like a letter with several sealed envelopes within. If you open up the outer envelope you are violating my privacy.

do it

@videotron.ca

Re: [Rant] Legalities of ISP packet sniffing

Which is why you should support CAIP's filing to the CRTC, if you haven't already.

»Help CAIP in it's CRTC submission re throttling via Bell

Dude111
An Awesome Dude
Premium
join:2003-08-04
USA
I agree... NO ISP should do this!

Stewy
Premium
join:2007-12-12
Kitchener, ON

Re: [Rant] Legalities of ISP packet sniffing

Of course it's illegal, it's right there in the communications act, and highly unethical but when it comes to the internet in this country there seems to be very little consumer protection and privacy laws and the Rogers and Bells are are foaming at the mouth and fully taking advantage of this and are abusing the Canadian owned telecommunications spectrum way beyond what is acceptable.

The government on this issue looks like a bunch of deer caught in the headlights and have no clue what to do or even what's going on.

Yea the CRTC are apparently involved but they're still figuring out the impact of the rotary dial and DOS 3.1

As to why there is not an immediate outcry from the Privy Council Office, the Justice department, the Communications, department or the Office of the Privacy Commissioner for that matter on this issue is very troubling.
elwoodblues
Elwood Blues

join:2006-08-30
Toronto, ON


1 edit

Re: [Rant] Legalities of ISP packet sniffing

said by Stewy See Profile :

As to why there is not an immediate outcry from the Privy Council Office, the Justice department, the Communications, department or the Office of the Privacy Commissioner for that matter on this issue is very troubling.
No it's not look at the government we have? They muzzle everything, so in the name of big business, they'll allow Bell and Robbers to get away with murder
Forums » O Canada! » Canadian » Canadian Broadband3web can't connect »
« Lobbying on 'net throttling' heads to Hill  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 11:54:48 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [65] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [57] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [53] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· 5 weeks and still no internet [TekSavvy]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· The aftermath [World of Warcraft]
· Buzzing whatchamacallit in ceiling...?? Help identify. [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]