upieper
join:2001-12-23
| CPU Load > 60%
Hi,
I'm having a CPU load of over 60% (with a P4 3.06HT) when loading this page in FX 3.0 beta5 /IE7 /Opera 9.2 :
»wetter.rtl.de/deutschland/uebers···r=0A48A5
What I'm wondering is if it's just me or do you guys get the same strain on resources with your PC?
PS: I have flash V9.0 r124 installed. |
|
Lanik
Lab-nik
Premium,ExMod 2002-03
join:2001-06-25
Bay Area | WFM
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9pre) Gecko/2008050206 Minefield/3.0pre - Build ID: 2008050206
--
"If it ain't broke don't fix it." |
|
upieper
join:2001-12-23
| Hi Lanik,
I suppose WFM means "works for me". It's working for me too, but I have that abnormal CPU spike, which I think is due to Flash.
I have now installed the same Minefield build as you have but the result is the same.
How much CPU usage do you have on that page?
Greetings,
UP |
|
Grail Knight
Who Dares Wins
Premium
join:2003-05-31
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| I noticed a CPU spike on that site also using Fx v3pre (Minefield).
I know there is abug filed at Bugzilla for flash causing hign memory usage but do not have the address to it so you will have to look for it.
--
"Why answer any questions when you can pull a MuMu"? - unknown |
|
Lanik
Lab-nik
Premium,ExMod 2002-03
join:2001-06-25
Bay Area
| reply to upieper
said by upieper  :I suppose WFM means "works for me". That's exactly what it means.
said by upieper :How much CPU usage do you have on that page? I see less then 10% lots of Flash bugs were fixed after the release of b5.
--
"If it ain't broke don't fix it." |
|
upieper
join:2001-12-23 | GK&Lanik,
thanks for your replies. The CPU load seems unrelated to Firefox on my machine. I'm getting the 60% load with IE & Opera, too.
UP |
|
Somnambul33t
L33t.
Premium
join:2002-12-05
Mullica Hill, NJ
clubs:
 ·Comcast
| said by upieper :GK&Lanik, thanks for your replies. The CPU load seems unrelated to Firefox on my machine. I'm getting the 60% load with IE & Opera, too. UP sounds like a virus or spyware
--
Somnambulator - t3h 5133pw41k3r
SEyE TF2 Server
~Choosy moms choose Jif~ |
|
upieper
join:2001-12-23 | No, my PC is clean. I have SSM, Comodo & Antivir and nothing suspicious is running on the machine....
UP |
|
Abiosis
join:2003-09-25
Covina, CA |  reply to upieper
Win XP or Vista(SP1?)...it's huge different between these 2....you got 2GB ram or 4GB?  |
|
upieper
join:2001-12-23 | My system is: Win XP Pro SP3, 1,5 GB RAM, P4 3,06GHz HT CPU.
Should be enough to handle some flash, or? |
|
nwrickert
sand groper
Premium,MVM
join:2004-09-04
Geneva, IL
 ·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T Midwest
| reply to upieper
What I'm wondering is if it's just me or do you guys get the same strain on resources with your PC? No strain here. But then I am using "noscript" and "flashblock", so those flash applets don't run unless I manually enable them.
Running a bunch of concurrent flash applets can eat cpu cycles. I recommend flashblock.
--
AT&T dsl; Westell 327w modem/router; SuSE 10.1; firefox 2.0.0.14 |
|
Vamp
5c077
Premium
join:2003-01-28
MD
·Verizon FIOS
| reply to upieper
It went upto 30% max for me, and when sitting idle without moving mouse it stays around 15-20 or so over both cores. Nothing seems unusual considering there is flash on the site.
--
!= null |
|
upieper
join:2001-12-23
| reply to upieper
The new V10 flash seems to be much better performance wise:
»fileforum.betanews.com/detail/Ad···714156/1
That will probably fix my problem (hopefully) |
|
