ponline
join:2004-03-04
presheva
| reply to cmaenginsb
Re: Ubiquiti Nano
said by cmaenginsb  :said by nevtxjustin :said by 76580315 :Does Ubiquiti think anything out before pulling the trigger. As in using a standard SMA connector instead of an FCC required non-standard connector, like Rev-SMA? How that thing got FCC certified is beyond me. The same way Redline,Tranzeo, Smartbridges and many others do. If you require professional installation you can be exempted from the non-standard connector requirement. LOL That's not good. Obviously I'm not that professional. 
I did a research about them, I did the order, I tested them for 5 days (without external antenna), and yet how stupid i was that I didn't read the specs carefully about the SMA connector.
Yesterday my installer was on a long distance link trying to get the link better signal attaching an external antenna, and off course all my pigtails until now was rev-sma, and the worst thing is they can be connected to the SMA, so he didn't notice that we have the wrong pigtail.
I was on the NOC checking the signal and he was aligning antennas. We lost about two hours, trying to figure why we get worst signal with external 29dbi antenna, replaced 2 antennas and 3 pigtails and same results. Olalaaa |
