Re: Ubiquiti Nano in Wireless Service Providers http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20433230 en Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:01:14 EDT Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:01:14 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20469521 trc120 : 2 are for the screws that hold the case together. I am not sure what the unused one if for.

TRC]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20469521 Mon, 12 May 2008 11:59:05 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20465150 nomaad : Anybody know what the three wittle mounting standoffs in the connection compartment are for? lightning protection?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20465150 Sun, 11 May 2008 12:06:09 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20437725 cmaenginsb : My first RP vs normal was with MMCX which is harder to see than SMA. After the first time of not succeeding and realizing the problem we always double check the connector on the card/radio etc before ordering.

As to professional installation, there currently is no certification or any real statement as to what that consists of. In general it means the end user is not attempting to install the radio itself, but I've met many WISPs and Wifi installers who are definitely not what I would call professional.
--
CCNA, Comtrain Certified Tower Climber]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20437725 Tue, 06 May 2008 00:02:24 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435052 kewlkeed : Link tests are tomorrow. I'll post results. I've geared their association rate down to 36mbps instead of 54 and that's where is seems to hold the best. Tomorrow is going to be the do or die day as I beat on that link for a while to see what it can do.

So far I'm really impressed with the units, they handle well, hardware rocks (Asides from the wingnuts) getting the link up took all of half an hour with one person at each end. Alignment was done by eye and link was already there when we powered up. Just needed to dial them in and the job was done.

Can't get much better for the price :) ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435052 Mon, 05 May 2008 15:08:28 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20434978 haywire : What kind of TCP speed are you getting on that 26 km setup?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20434978 Mon, 05 May 2008 14:55:37 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20434938 expert007 : Wow..pretty impressive, thanks for the info. If you do any testing with the NS/PS in AP/WDS mode, please post the results. I'm becoming more and more infatuated with these things.

Cheers!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20434938 Mon, 05 May 2008 14:47:09 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20434430 kewlkeed : Just finished a 26KM link using two PS5 units. Link was aprox -70 so not too bad.

Found a big complaint about the PS units compared to the NS ones. The wing nuts used on the mounting bracket SUCK. To get it to hold the radio solid you need to tighten them a lot more than your fingers are capable of doing. Unfortunately tightening them with anything more than your fingers causes them to split in half. They either need the metal to have some more grip (Love the quality paint job, but it makes the metal slick) or some washers with jagged edges.

Replaced wing nuts with proper nuts and tightened them down with a wrench and everything is perfect.

Still not a big complaint, but you'll want to cry if you blow a wing nut on a tower and don't have a replacement.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20434430 Mon, 05 May 2008 13:10:59 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20433951 expert007 : Great information...have you done any range or coverage testing yet with the NS2/5?

These things look like the real deal. Thanks!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20433951 Mon, 05 May 2008 11:28:09 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20433468 kewlkeed : Bingo, hence the "quick fix" I mentioned :D

Just careful not to tighten too much or you'll hear a nice *CRACK* noise followed by colorful language.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20433468 Mon, 05 May 2008 09:33:47 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20433418 aeronet : Instead of Tie-wraps use Hose Clamps]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20433418 Mon, 05 May 2008 09:14:42 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20433323 kewlkeed : Been testing the NS2 and NS5 units and now have a set of PS5 and PS2 units sitting on my desk for this week.

So far I've been really impressed. Yes the SMA thing is a bit of a pain, but I caught that right away before we found it the hard way.

All I can say is, for the price, you get a VERY well manufactured unit, a load of power, a working firmware, and peace of mind. The only thing I can remotely call a "flaw" with these are that they are 802.11 and not a proprietary protocol, but again that can also be a big pro depending on what eyes you see them from.

Tiny annoyance I find is the mounting on the NS units, I don't particularly like the idea of mounting something with a tie-wrap, but that's fixable.

Final word from me, SERIOUS bang for your buck. There's no mickey-mouse BS on these units from what I can tell. Finally something as solid as a Trango for straight 802.11 without the massive price. Now to see what time will test for durability.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20433323 Mon, 05 May 2008 08:38:29 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20433230 ponline :
said by cmaenginsb See Profile :

said by nevtxjustin See Profile :

said by 76580315 See Profile :

Does Ubiquiti think anything out before pulling the trigger.
As in using a standard SMA connector instead of an FCC required non-standard connector, like Rev-SMA? How that thing got FCC certified is beyond me.
The same way Redline,Tranzeo, Smartbridges and many others do. If you require professional installation you can be exempted from the non-standard connector requirement.
LOL That's not good. Obviously I'm not that professional. :D
I did a research about them, I did the order, I tested them for 5 days (without external antenna), and yet how stupid i was that I didn't read the specs carefully about the SMA connector.
Yesterday my installer was on a long distance link trying to get the link better signal attaching an external antenna, and off course all my pigtails until now was rev-sma, and the worst thing is they can be connected to the SMA, so he didn't notice that we have the wrong pigtail.
I was on the NOC checking the signal and he was aligning antennas. We lost about two hours, trying to figure why we get worst signal with external 29dbi antenna, replaced 2 antennas and 3 pigtails and same results. Olalaaa]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20433230 Mon, 05 May 2008 08:01:23 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20432631 cmaenginsb :
said by nevtxjustin See Profile :

said by 76580315 See Profile :

Does Ubiquiti think anything out before pulling the trigger.
As in using a standard SMA connector instead of an FCC required non-standard connector, like Rev-SMA? How that thing got FCC certified is beyond me.
The same way Redline,Tranzeo, Smartbridges and many others do. If you require professional installation you can be exempted from the non-standard connector requirement.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20432631 Mon, 05 May 2008 00:50:01 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20430735 nevtxjustin :
said by 76580315 See Profile :

Does Ubiquiti think anything out before pulling the trigger.
As in using a standard SMA connector instead of an FCC required non-standard connector, like Rev-SMA? How that thing got FCC certified is beyond me.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20430735 Sun, 04 May 2008 16:27:50 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400362 expert007 : I'm wondering if I could use these things as follows:

1) Base NS2 (or NS5)in WDS/AP mode with an external omni mounted atop a building and connected to wired backhaul.

2) Remote wireless NS2/5's in WDS mode in areas that need coverage.

Remotes would talk to client (only a few clients necessary, overload/bandwidth not an issue) and pass traffic to Base NS2/5.

Should never be more than 2/3 hops....so latency bandwidth should be good.......perhaps a cheap and effective WLAN for a few clients??]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20400362 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:57:03 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20387373 Stealthwave : I set-up 2 NS5 units 1 in AP-WDS and the other Client-WDS. When I ran a quick bench test they worked fine, but didn't check max through-put.

When the tech installs them for a video system between 2 buildings I'll post the results. Not sure when this will happen though.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20387373 Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:14:53 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20387217 expert007 : So is anyone using these things in WDS mode? And if so, how much throughput/latency are you seeing with each hop?

Also, can an NS deployed with WDS talk to a PS as a base? ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20387217 Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:50:39 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20387197 cmaenginsb : Anyone in the US has to follow the rules of the FCC.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20387197 Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:45:01 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20384446 sarpkaya : Well, FCC is not important in Turkey. But As I understand you are from Texas. I don't know laws of FCC and I don't know if it must be suitable??? of your system or not.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20384446 Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:09:34 EDT Re: Which firmware do you run on these? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20383280 Stealthwave : The beta AirOs was out last week. Now the 1st release is out today. Here is the link for the info.
»www.ubnt.com/airos/#feat

Here is the AirOS links
»www.ubnt.com/support/airos.php]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20383280 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:45:45 EDT Re: Which firmware do you run on these? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20382442 public :
said by harmetp See Profile :

Does it come with the AirOS firmware (I saw the specs, but maybe I missed it)? The airos looks like it has most of the features that we need is it pretty decent to work with? Is there other firmware that folks tend to run on the ubnt radios?

Thanks, Pat
»www.dd-wrt.com/dd-wrtv3/dd-wrt/d···ads.html]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20382442 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:17:35 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20381726 Stealthwave : I am using the internal antenna. I also have another at 3.2 miles from the pop with the older AirOS using internal antenna also and this one is NLOS.

Well goody for you sarpkaya, bet it's not FCC certified! I never said I used external antenna.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20381726 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:50:44 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380857 ike20004 :
said by expert007 See Profile :

Are these things really THAT good? Can reach a NS2 in AP mode from a client card at miles (!) NLOS??? Geez.....I'm looking to connect from 3/4 of a mile with Near LOS.....and I was planning on using a few units!

Am I missing something?
Geez too! "27" miles? Don't make them raise the price.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380857 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:23:04 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380834 sarpkaya : well, I made this product(2.4 ghz version) for 65$ with 400mW output power and it has availability to connect it high gain antennas and mountable to dishes.
Hmm, let's think they should made this item for 50$ and sells 80$ 30 bucks is enough.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380834 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:18:11 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380448 Stealthwave : Yesterday installed a NS2 at 4.1 miles from AP and the link CCQ is 93% and tower sees it at -71. I also have the new AirOS beta 3.0 running on it. Time will tell.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20380448 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:12:02 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20379078 expert007 : Are these things really THAT good? Can reach a NS2 in AP mode from a client card at miles (!) NLOS??? Geez.....I'm looking to connect from 3/4 of a mile with Near LOS.....and I was planning on using a few units!

Am I missing something?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20379078 Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:58:19 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20346144 MicroWISP : 27 miles with the integrated? Not bad...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20346144 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:06:36 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20344642 jbkenn : Just used the integrated , will try it next week with external 16dBi grid, let you know how I get on]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20344642 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:30:42 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20328521 stojke : Did u use external antenna or just Nanostation integrated?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20328521 Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:05:42 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20322461 Stealthwave : Will I like them alot.
I have 4 out in the field just got another batch in as well. Waiting on the new AirOS 3.0 to come out and test and if it works like it should I will be slowly rolling all cpes over to them that will it my towers this this or using the PS2 I like them as well and not having problems with them ether. Darn good pice for what you get.

The last NS2 i put out is about 2.8 miles out with NLOS and seen at the AP -71 CCQ 85% on cpe with -74.

Like UBNT alot been using there cards since the SR2 hit the street.

I have no ties to UBNT in sales just saying what I am using and how they proform.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20322461 Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:11:45 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20321963 superdog :
said by gmcintire See Profile :

The transmit power on the unit doesn't have anything at all to do with its receive sensitivity. Conversely, the wide beamwidth can greatly contribute to picking up extra noise.
I agree. :)

Here again, the higher the power of the radio, the further the signal will travel, irregardless of its receive sensitivity. the more the signal travels, the more noise and other radios it will see. :)
--
»www.wavecrazy.net Join WISPA today! »www.wispa.org/]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20321963 Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:52:38 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20321944 jbkenn : I started this topic, an update

I am using one myself, at 3 miles from AP surrounded by home wireless routers I have
Signal Strenght -62 dBm
TX Rate 11 Mbps - RX Rate 11 Mbps
Transmit CCQ 97%
Very pleased.

I set up a Nano in AP mode and did a signal test from a Nano at 27 Miles
Signal Strenght was -89, pings were average 32ms with some timeouts.

Easy to configure, easy to install, would highly recommend them, Ubiquiti have certainly set the bar, for all others to follow]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20321944 Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:44:36 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20317405 Mad Dawg : They function as ap,client or wds]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20317405 Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:45:19 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20317393 gmcintire : I have a few of the NS5 and NS2 an the way to test out, I'll post my results after I get them deployed.

said by superdog See Profile :

At 400mw, this unit is going to see EVERYTHING around it for quite a distance. In some of the places I am deploying CPE's, it would probably see at LEAST 30 AP's on a site survey because of the wide beam.
The transmit power on the unit doesn't have anything at all to do with its receive sensitivity. Conversely, the wide beamwidth can greatly contribute to picking up extra noise.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20317393 Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:43:16 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20317055 ponline : Do they also work as Acess Points, or only as Clients?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20317055 Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:19:41 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20314259 pkcie : Hi we use Osbridge 24XLIG on our network and have got 3 Nano Station's up and running.I found that it took me half the time to install them and also very easy to line up with the aid of the led Lights.One lazy complaint you cant see LED's at the back of them if you want to mount them again the wall/chimney.I Compared the the db of an Osbridge24xlig and Nano Station on our AP and the difference was Osbridge -62 Nano -63 .

Pat ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20314259 Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:16:03 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20082492 Airnode :
said by Bigpaddy_Irl See Profile :

These new units look something similar to the new 1208 units Star-os have just come out with. Man I wish they would make a cpe like Ubnt's new Nano's where you could align it by the lights on the back. It would make installations alot more fast and easy.
The StarOs unit are made by Compex (WPP54) Infineon ADM5120 based boards with 4MB flash and 32Mb Ram and uses a Atheros
minipci if i remember writh.

Chek out this for the Outdoorunit »www.compex.com.sg/home/products1···01540211

and this for the naked Board »www.compex.com.sg/home/OEM/product_ap.htm

anyhow i think same as you, the align leds can save time
on installations.

Stefan]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20082492 Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:16:02 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20077678 Bigpaddy_Irl : These new units look something similar to the new 1208 units Star-os have just come out with. Man I wish they would make a cpe like Ubnt's new Nano's where you could align it by the lights on the back. It would make installations alot more fast and easy.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20077678 Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:37:48 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20077477 76580315 : I don't think this is in the same class as Meraki unless your speaking of the cost and we all saw what Meraki did after investors like Google started demanding a return.

Ubiquiti could be taking a loss on these to get the ball rolling and to make up for the PS2 disappointment. Ubiquiti's investors will also be demanding a return so after the bug fixes and improvements are finished (98 to date I think I saw in their release notes) they too will be raising their prices.

So if you want to be a bug reporter, get in line and order some.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20077477 Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:09:35 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076441 anon : Looks like this will take over Meraki - if they can put Mesh in it, or, leave it open for other OS. Looks great!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076441 Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:28:07 EDT Re: Which firmware do you run on these? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076178 Airnode :
said by harmetp See Profile :

Does it come with the AirOS firmware (I saw the specs, but maybe I missed it)? The airos looks like it has most of the features that we need is it pretty decent to work with? Is there other firmware that folks tend to run on the ubnt radios?
As far as i now they will have the new AirOs on it wich will avible for the Ps2/Ps5 too .
I only can hope that they make the sdk and source open like they did it with the current Firmware 2.2 for Ps2/5 and Ls2/5.

The current Firmware (2.2 and 2.2.1) runs verry decent and fixed lots of problems they had in the versions before .

BTW i just preordered 5 nanosation5's they will be avaible in Eu in end of march ore so.

New toys harr... :D

Stefan]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076178 Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:12:17 EDT Which firmware do you run on these? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076047 harmetp : Does it come with the AirOS firmware (I saw the specs, but maybe I missed it)? The airos looks like it has most of the features that we need is it pretty decent to work with? Is there other firmware that folks tend to run on the ubnt radios?

Thanks, Pat]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076047 Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:14:16 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20065400 Stealthwave : Just because it runs 400 mph don't mean it has to run 400 mph. The nice part is you can add your on antenna. You can't buy any outdoor cpe for 79 bucks.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20065400 Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:16:46 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20064381 76580315 : This may explain the small antenna. Europe has much lower EIRP limits. Also noticed there is no way to tilt without purchasing an additional tilt style pole mount. :huh:
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20064381 Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:28:32 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20063722 slipstream1 : What I am looking at is the additional antenna connector on this unit. It would make a nice tiny unit for 24 dbi grid installation, with the correct adaptor.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20063722 Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:31:21 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20063550 ponline : Very nice design and great price especialy for the NS5. Anyway the bad side is low gain. I supose there will be separate reflectors on the market soon to suport them for higher gain(like canopy)!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20063550 Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:56:06 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20063384 kewlkeed : I'm curious to see how one of these would stack up to a Deliberant 2112 unit. They seem similar except for that the DLB has a 12dbi antenna and probably a more narrow beam width. But the NS2 has a higher power from what I see so far.

Could be interesting, although I'd certainly like the antenna to be a little tighter.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20063384 Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:16:17 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20063287 superdog :
said by 76580315 See Profile :

13dB is the absolute lowest we would go on a CPE regardless of power levels. That's twice the gain of a 10dB. 10dB at a 60 degree beamwidth with 400mW has no place in our outdoor deployments. It would spread RF absolutely everywhere we don't want it.

Can anyone else here see why you would want a 60 degree beamwidth for a client CPE? especially at 400mW. How much harder would it have been to use a 13dB? Sure, you wouldn't be able to use the Canopy look alike housing with a 13dB antenna.

Paul
I am going to agree with this. While I somehow think this unit was designed for more indoor installs than outdoor, this is way to much power in such a wide antenna. At 400mw, this unit is going to see EVERYTHING around it for quite a distance. In some of the places I am deploying CPE's, it would probably see at LEAST 30 AP's on a site survey because of the wide beam.

When deploying in areas like the one I just mentioned, it seems the only way to roll is with a very high gain antenna unit with very low power.

»CPE's with less than a 12dBi antenna?
--
»www.wavecrazy.net Join WISPA today! »www.wispa.org/]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20063287 Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:40:06 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20062333 76580315 : 13dB is the absolute lowest we would go on a CPE regardless of power levels. That's twice the gain of a 10dB. 10dB at a 60 degree beamwidth with 400mW has no place in our outdoor deployments. It would spread RF absolutely everywhere we don't want it. Does Ubiquiti think anything out before pulling the trigger.

I can see a great need for these in hotel / MDU deployments. That's a great beamwidth to be shooting down hall ways.

Can anyone else here see why you would want a 60 degree beamwidth for a client CPE? especially at 400mW. How much harder would it have been to use a 13dB? Sure, you wouldn't be able to use the Canopy look alike housing with a 13dB antenna.

Paul]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20062333 Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:28:15 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20062201 Stealthwave : Yeap, already seen it on those sites!

Sucks to have to wait that long to buy units to try.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20062201 Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:01:48 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20061848 mogooder : »www.wlanparts.com/c=UPBZKZDVL1wL···biquiti/
»www.streakwave.com/Product-UBNT.···Ubiquity

Release late March ;)

mogooder
--
"The Secret is in the RITHMATIC" Henry Hudson]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20061848 Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:03:20 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20061776 Stealthwave : I'll be a pig and try some can't wait for them to be on market. They got a hole new pile of goodies coming.

The PS2 Vpol with 2.2os on it is running fine no problems. I have not tried the new 2.2.1os]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20061776 Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:52:56 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20060957 LLigetfa : Nothing ventured, nothing gained.
Say nothing, say nothing wrong.
Do nothing, do nothing right.

A whole lot of nothing. :huh:]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20060957 Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:35:35 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20060835 76580315 : They don't appear to be released yet.

Why not be a gunie pig?

Paul]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20060835 Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:13:50 EDT Re: Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20060663 Bigpaddy_Irl : Hi Jb, I believe we may of met before on boards?
I too am the same, im not gonna be the gunie pig this time.
The units are beautiful looking and im sure they are as robust as the ps2.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20060663 Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:45:43 EDT Ubiquiti Nano http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20060320 jbkenn : Has anyone tried any of these new Ubiquiti Nano's?
»www.ubnt.com/products/ns2.php
Following my experience with the Powerstation 2, I am reluctant to be an early adaptor.

jbkenn]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20060320 Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:51:02 EDT