<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>[ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra Lite in Rogers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20434713</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:28:34 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:28:34 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra L</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20464733</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1471406"><b>adampak20</b></A> : If you want a faster speed, then upgrade to one, dont expect the world for free.<br><br>These companies aren't here to please you, and its blantly obvious of that.   They are here to make money.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20464733</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 09:56:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra L</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20458489</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/662682"><b>Austin007</b></A> : I intended this thread to stay about download speeds, not the bandwidth cap, hence my previous post.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20458489</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:18:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra L</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20452195</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : The difference between new/old customer's usage caps for light and ultralight is detailed here at this link along with caps for the other service tiers: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.rogers.com/web/content/internet-hispeedc/internet_usage" >www.rogers.com/web/content/inter&middot;&middot;&middot;et_usage</A><br><br>One catch mentioned elsewhere is caps on overage fees for new light/ultralight customers that don't apply to existing customers. So woe to any old light user that brings down say 100gb in a month and gets hit with $200 in overage fees. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20452195</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:12:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra L</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20452140</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Only new customers getting ultralight end up with the tiny 2 GB/month cap, existing customers before the change still have a 60 GB/month cap. <br><br>I am now paying $23.95+tax so $25.15 total for 512kpbs with a 60gb cap per month. I paid the $99.95+tax for the modem to save the currently $2/month modem rental fee on the assumption I will use it for a long time and they will probably increase the modem rental fee over time. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20452140</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:58:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra L</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20439032</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/662682"><b>Austin007</b></A> : I'm speaking strictly on download speeds, not about usage capacities.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20439032</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:35:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra L</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20436368</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/539077"><b>sbrook</b></A> : The increases in speed for extreme certainly haven't been without cost ... 3 increases in about 18 months isn't free.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20436368</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:15:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra L</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20436085</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Because they upgraded everyone else for free, EXCEPT the Lite users.<hr></blockquote><br> :uhh:Hmmm.... For free? Let me see. Ultra-lite was 21.95 when I signed up. After that "free upgrade" it is now 24.95<br><br>When Lite was and is 32.95 for people that signed up before Jan 15, 2008. For those who signed up later it is 34.95.<br><br>So my point is that that upgrade is not free in any way.<br><br>Knowing rogers I would not ask them for any so-called upgrades because all of them seem more like downgrades to me (I am looking at the caps). I would prefer 256k service with the old cap, or at least 10Gig cap.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20436085</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:23:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra L</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435886</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/539077"><b>sbrook</b></A> : when was lite upgraded from 512 to 1024?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435886</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:46:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra L</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435686</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/662682"><b>Austin007</b></A> : Because they upgraded everyone else for free, EXCEPT the Lite users.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435686</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:08:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra L</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435548</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/632745"><b>oldwise1</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Leathal <A HREF="/useremail/u/581584"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Austin007 <A HREF="/useremail/u/662682"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>A few months ago all cable services download speeds were upgraded, except for Lite and UL users.  Can we get enough customers here to push Rogers to upgrading the rest of us? <br> </div>Why would Rogers raise the speeds on Lite users? If you want faster speeds get the next level of service. :)<br><br>leathal<br> </div>Exactly, ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435548</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:40:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra L</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435164</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1533429"><b>Goldielover</b></A> : Yes, these were definitely upgraded recently.  My Ultra Lite doubled in both upload and download speeds.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20435164</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:36:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra L</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20434956</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/539077"><b>sbrook</b></A> : I'm sure these were raised fairly recently to 512 and 1024 kbps.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20434956</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:51:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra L</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20434836</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/581584"><b>Leathal</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Austin007 <A HREF="/useremail/u/662682"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>A few months ago all cable services download speeds were upgraded, except for Lite and UL users.  Can we get enough customers here to push Rogers to upgrading the rest of us? <br> </div>Why would Rogers raise the speeds on Lite users? If you want faster speeds get the next level of service. :)<br><br>leathal]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20434836</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:25:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[ Ultra/Lite] Poll/Petition Rogers to upgrade Lite &#x26; Ultra Lite</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20434713</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/662682"><b>Austin007</b></A> : A few months ago all cable services download speeds were upgraded, except for Lite and UL users.  Can we get enough customers here to push Rogers to upgrading the rest of us? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20434713</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:01:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
