Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Comcast Scraps P2P 'Bill Of Rights' Idea » Sigh....
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
118
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Consumer Advocates would be intentionally disruptive »
« Flip-floppers  
AuthorAll Replies


ptrowski
Got Helix?
Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
clubs:
Sigh....

Surprise surprise....
Anyone who thought they actually wanted this to work in the interest of the consumer was sorely mistaken.


jt45

@comcast.net

this does work in your favorite. by stopping illegal downloads your speed on the internet service will increase. you dont like it because you download illegal content. how about you pay for the product and service you want. stop downloading illegal content


ptrowski
Got Helix?
Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
clubs:
It works in my favorite? Never heard that phrase before.

I don't download illegal content. It affects Vuze, a perectly legal use of P2P. There are also plenty of perfectly legit uses for P2P.

But I guess you just forgot about those.


swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to ptrowski
The big ISPs are trying to set up a situation where they offer a sterilized, commercialized p2p service, and ban all other p2p. The trick is implying that all other p2p (other than their approved service) would exist only for copyright infringement. This would make the customers of each ISP a captive market with the ISP having a monopoly on its subscribers' p2p needs; and it would contrive a phony excuse for traffic discrimination (opposite of network neutrality).

Of course the proposition that all p2p other than the ISP-approved services is illegal, is a big, deliberate lie. In reality, internet subscribers may prefer to use something other than the ISP-managed p2p for many good reasons:

    • The people at the other end of the connection choose to share on something other than the ISP's service.
    • Preferring not to pay an extra fee to the ISP.
    • Well-justified distrust of closed-source applications.
    • Avoiding monitoring and filtering.

Stopping copyright infringement is only the excuse the ISPs give in public for monitoring and filtering. But if they get the power, they'll use it for political censorship, political spying, price-gouging, unwanted marketing, "fishing" for blackmail material on behalf of government, and other abuses.


OdinFaktor

join:2001-02-12
New York, NY
  Excellent post. Good to see some people aren't so easily hoodwink-able!
Forums » Comcast Scraps P2P 'Bill Of Rights' IdeaConsumer Advocates would be intentionally disruptive »
« Flip-floppers  


Monday, 06-Oct 12:40:14 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [23] It's Cable TV Rate Hike Season
· [19] Customers Still Annoyed By FiOS Billing
· [10] Verizon Says Alltel Deal On Schedule
· [8] Half Of New iPhone Owners Came From Verizon
Most people now reading
· No more usage checker? [TekSavvy]
· Texas Realignment Thread - 10/6 [Verizon FIOS TV]
· IMG 1.6 Build 06.89 Released [Verizon FIOS TV]
· New Channel Realignment #2 [Verizon FIOS TV]
· [XP Home] I can't get past blue screen [Microsoft help]
· [XPAV infection?] Cannot log in to windows, nor safe mode [Security]
· [Serious] Breaking news - TSE down 1000 points [Canadian Chat]
· Life Insurance Questions [General Questions]
· Security Software Updates - 06 Oct 2008 [Security]