 Chuckles0Premium
join:2006-03-04
Saint Paul, MN | Rollover... There should be some type of roll over MBs/GBs. |
|
 ztmikeMark for moderationPremium
join:2001-08-02
Michigan City, IN
1 edit | 250mb? LOL if that's not a type-o, then DAMN that's fucked up.
Good thing I have atat dsl available.
Edit: I see it was a type-o..still 250gb is not shit these days..with game consoles being more online featured/downloads and computer updates then your regular surfing habits..
Why is Comcast even upgrading users to 16/2 50/5 if they can't even handle 6/384 8/768?
--
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdYueIC1pjM |
|
 TopmounterSent By Grocery Clerks
join:2001-02-20
Evergreen, CO | Speed and Data Transfer are two different things. |
|
 RARPSL
join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY | reply to Chuckles0
said by Chuckles0:There should be some type of roll over MBs/GBs. I agree (and was going to post something like this myself). If I am allowed to go to 250GB/month, I should be able to at least apply some of my under usage in one month to over usage in the next/subsequent months. Either go to a Rolling Average (3 months minimum) or give me something like 50% of the under use for the prior month (which gets cut by 50% when it is 2 months old, 50% again when 3 months old, and expires at the 4th month). This would roll over 100GB (if I only used 150GB one month) which then rolls over as 50GB, 25GB, and then expires. I am suggesting a meet-us-halfway Roll-Over plan as opposed to 100% Roll-Over where the banked Roll-Over GBs keep the cap to 250GB times the number of months. I feel that a fair system can work as "Use It or Lose It" and expire old Rolled-Over Under-usage after some period of time. |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1 | Go away, this isn't AT&T.  |
|
