<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Enough with these mergers in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20442011</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:18:54 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:18:54 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Enough with these mergers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20442184</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1528955"><b>EPS</b></A> : Not much competition killed here. Clearwire and Sprint had plans for dividing up the country and working together rather than competing from early on- the original joint venture failed, but a new deal was always expected, while the other companies involved (cablecos, Google, Intel) were never going to become wireless companies on their own. (except for Cox, which isn't involved here)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20442184</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:07:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Enough with these mergers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20442024</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/184389"><b>quientus</b></A> : Mergers in this case means we get to use the friggin thing instead of having it die. Seriously, if you want competition you need to have a product first.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20442024</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:42:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Enough with these mergers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20442011</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/697274"><b>mrchris</b></A> : Mergers mean less competition, less choices for us consumers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20442011</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:38:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
