<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Oklahoma did the same thing as MO is doing... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20444743</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:17:18 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:17:18 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Oklahoma did the same thing as MO is doing...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20445201</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : Well, it's not quite that bad.... at least there's Cellphone signal in most places... Well unless U get well outside the towns, and are not near any major highways.<br><br>But yeah, there's no cable or DSL or wireless Internet, just dialup, and whatever it passes thru kills V.90 and V.92 and leaves you with less then 33.6k speed.<br><br>Slow doesn't describe it on the modern net.  It's awful.<br><small>--<br>"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20445201</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:38:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oklahoma did the same thing as MO is doing...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20444743</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1227273"><b>fuziwuzi</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  KrK <A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Result:  Rural areas, even areas just outside of towns and cities, have nothing but very slow dial-up. (56k even is a dream...)<br><br>For them, it's Satellite, or 26.4ish dialup.  I'm not talking about way out in the sticks, either.  <br> </div>It is the same in rural Virginia where my family lives.  The phone system physically limits a dialup connection to maximum 24kbps.  There is no DSL, no cable, no wireless.  Can't even get a cellphone signal.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20444743</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:20:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Oklahoma did the same thing as MO is doing...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20442616</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : ... and then at&t (then SBC) did put DSLAM's in the smaller towns.... partially fulfilling their pledge....<br><br>... but that's where it stops.  The towns.... Much of the rural areas was been sold off to companies like Windstream and other small operators.<br><br>Result:  Rural areas, even areas just outside of towns and cities, have nothing but very slow dial-up. (56k even is a dream...)<br><br>For them, it's Satellite, or 26.4ish dialup.  I'm not talking about way out in the sticks, either.  <br><small>--<br>"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20442616</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:40:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
