Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » iProvo Sold To Broadweave For $40 Million » Not tax debt
 
Search Topic:
  Share Topic:
RSS topic:
 toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
They accomplished the goal. Its up and running... »
« Yes, it's about walking away  
AuthorAll Replies


MattE
Obama '08
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
 Not tax debt

The main argument of most anti-muni pundits is that if these projects fail, the citizens will be on the hook for a huge tax burden.

This is proof that is not the case as they earned a cool $1.1 million off the deal.

soothsayer15

join:2002-03-01
Irving, TX
·Verizon FIOS
·Verizon Online DSL


edit:
May 7th, @01:45PM

said by MattE See Profile :

The main argument of most anti-muni pundits is that if these projects fail, the citizens will be on the hook for a huge tax burden.

This is proof that is not the case as they earned a cool $1.1 million off the deal.
They didn't turn a profit. If they had they wouldn't be selling it. It costs them $39.5 million to start it. They were on pace to lose $10 million dollars from 2005 to this year, and that's after adding another $1.2 Million in taxes. I can understand muni-broadband when there are no other options or just one competitor, but in a multi-competitor environment it doesn't make business sense. That's what free spending politicians don't understand. The same way they think giving kids computers will automatically make them smarter.


MattE
Obama '08
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
·Corporate Colocation

said by soothsayer15 See Profile :

said by MattE See Profile :

The main argument of most anti-muni pundits is that if these projects fail, the citizens will be on the hook for a huge tax burden.

This is proof that is not the case as they earned a cool $1.1 million off the deal.
They didn't turn a profit. If they had they wouldn't be selling it. It costs them $39.5 million to start it. They were on pace to lose $10 million dollars from 2005 to this year, and that's after adding another $1.2 Million in taxes. I can understand muni-broadband when there are no other options or just one competitor, but in a multi-competitor environment it doesn't make business sense. That's what free spending politicians don't understand. The same way they think giving kids computers will automatically make them smarter.
Governments don't exist to make a profit. If they do, they must reinvest those profits back for the public good.

The fact they are coming out $1.1 million ahead I think speaks volumes.

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX

Matt, I guess that you could say that they are 1.1 million ahead, but given that it is the government, I would look at it as 1.1 million less in the hole, so the taxpayers, in theory, get a 1.1 million break on their taxes, think I will hide and wait on that one.

Just semantics, really.
Forums » iProvo Sold To Broadweave For $40 MillionThey accomplished the goal. Its up and running... »
« Yes, it's about walking away  

Most commented news this week
· [178] East Coast Verizon Workers Authorize Strike
· [166] Is AT&T Hinting At Usage-Based Pricing This Fall?
· [149] Time Warner Cable Using Fine Print To Foist Caps On Customers
· [125] Is Broadband A Civil Right?
· [117] Comcast Hit With Another Throttling Lawsuit
· [116] The Great Landline Exodus Continues
· [102] Friday Open Thread
· [102] FCC Majority Plans To Punish Comcast For Throttling
· [97] Update Your Browser, Dummy
· [83] What's Your Favorite Newsgroup Provider?
Saturday, 26-Jul
23:32:13
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
8th year online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF