<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Uverse availability in AT&#x26;T Midwest</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20450133</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:22:13 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:22:13 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Uverse availability</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20451437</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1412457"><b>ILpt4U</b></A> : Also, VRAD loop lenghts (and therefore area served) will increase as soon as Pair Bonding is introduced, which is coming soon (sometime in the next year I think is what I've heard/read).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20451437</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:39:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Uverse availability</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20451151</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : Most RTs do not run out to 17.5K.  In fact you'll probably be hard-pressed to find many with local loops over 7500 feet.<br><br>The VRADs are an entirely different infrastructure and technology and are designed to serve much smaller numbers of customers each.  You are comparing apples to mangoes.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20451151</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:51:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Uverse availability</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20450604</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/749583"><b>justbits</b></A> : One interesting tidbit is that AT+T originally expected to be able to use VRADs to cover 5000 foot wire lengths, but they're having a hard time getting VDSL to handle it due to outside plant conditions. That's where your 3000' estimate likely comes in.<br><br>Are your calculations right? Are you factoring in all the turns (corners, aerials, underground) in the wire plant?<br><br>17 500 feet = 3.31439394 miles<br>Area of circle = pi * sqr(radius)<br>3.31439394*3.31439394*pi = 34.5110462 sq miles<br>(3 000 ft) * 3 000 ft * pi = 1.01420217 sq miles<br>(5 000 ft) * 5 000 ft * pi = 2.81722826 sq miles<br>Those calculations above would be for ideal conditions, which I'd bet are extremely rare.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20450604</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 10:01:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Uverse availability</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20450133</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1541326"><b>Waterbug</b></A> :   I was just doing some calculations, trying to determine the probability of Uverse availability.  Here is what I came up with:  An RT which delivers DSL covers a radius of 17,500' (3miles plus).  That equates to an area of over 28 sq miles.  A VRAD covers a radius of 3000'.  That equates to less than 1.25 sq miles.  So, it takes over 22 VRADs to cover the area of one RT.  That's a lot of infrastructure.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20450133</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:35:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
