site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
484
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


alchav

join:2002-05-17
Palm Desert, CA

The Common Person is Confused!

Like I have been saying for years, Wi-Fi is not the Holy Grail for Broadband. When people hear of Wi-Fi they think this will replace their Broadband Connection and they are looking for the same speed, reliability, and service. So most of these Wi-Fi Networks are less than 1Mbps, not fast enough to replace your Home Broadband.

patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

said by alchav:

So most of these Wi-Fi Networks are less than 1Mbps, not fast enough to replace your Home Broadband.
Bingo, 802.11B can have max 4.5 mbit/s shared between the AP and 1 user (assuming no other users, and perfect connection with no error correction needed). G is 17mbit/s shared among all users. Cable for example is 40 mbit/s, perhaps a muni wifi network running N equipment with all N clients can pull that off, but N isn't even a standard yet.....


Corehhi

join:2002-01-28
Bluffton, SC

Wimax may improve speeds. It's coming for sure to the US now. Big deployment in the developing world.


patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

Yeah, with what spectrum? Philly govt will pay for it? or Earthlink?


Wednesday, 30-May 13:01:42 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics