<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>[DIRECTV] Versus HD signal on ch 604 has some issues in Cable &#x26; Satellite TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20456286</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:11:45 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:11:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [DIRECTV] Versus HD signal on ch 604 has some issues</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20467840</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/171865"><b>Hayward</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  shezams <A HREF="/useremail/u/451782"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>a few times it has been bad enough I couldn't stand it and had to watch it on Versus' analog feed.<br> </div> With the transition to digital overall what makes you think it was analog? VS SD digital even if delivered to you that way?<br><br>   Plain fact is especially SD you can fit digitallly 4 channels in the space of one analog channel... net work is not delivering to customer... likely analog delivered or not pretty much all networks are digitally delivering to Cable/Sat providers, that may still be providing to end user in analog. I know in certain cases fr fact as I have seen digital BROADCAST not TAPE distortion/failure on analog provided channels.<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://haywardm.com" >haywardm.com</A> (Hayward's Key West)<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20467840</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:58:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [DIRECTV] Versus HD signal on ch 604 has some issues</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20456663</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/749222"><b>dishfish</b></A> : Thanks Shezams.  I've been going crazy trying to get someone from DirecTV to research this issue.  I felt like it is not on my end.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20456663</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:50:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [DIRECTV] Versus HD signal on ch 604 has some issues</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20456651</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/451782"><b>shezams</b></A> : I have had a similar experience with VS and the HD hockey feed - then the damn golf is fine - this on Comcast - so maybe it IS the  hockey HD feed. I love watching hockey in HD, but a few times it has been bad enough I couldn't stand it and had to watch it on Versus' analog feed.<br><small>--<br>Simple rules - no offsides, no intent to maim, everything else is all good!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20456651</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:47:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[DIRECTV] Versus HD signal on ch 604 has some issues</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20456286</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/749222"><b>dishfish</b></A> : OK experts, here's one for you.  I am watching the STARS- RED WINGS game last night on ch 604 Versus HD on my HD DVR.  The picture is good then about every 30 seconds, I get streaking/pixelization.  So after the STARS game is over, I start watching the golf from TPC Sawgrass on the same ch 604 but instead the feed is now from the GOLF channel.  I don't get that pixelization/streaking anymore.  So is the Versus feed just bad or is there some issue with the HD DVR?  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20456286</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 10:50:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
