  thefish
@charter.com
| [CATV] Analog TV with Charter cable
Currently I am subscribed to Charter Expanded Basic through my analog Tv without a cable box (Tv is connected directly to wall outlet).
When the digital switchover occurs next year will I still be able to receive all my expanded basic channels or would I need a digital cable box?
Thanks |
|
 petercooper
join:2008-02-29 Charlton, MA
| The Broadcast TV analog to digital switchover will not affect you at all.
See »www.charter.com/digitaltransition for Charter's reassurance of that.
Completely separate from the broadcast switchover, Charter is likely within the next year or few years going to be switching more and more things to digital. It's entirely likely that one of those is the expanded basic channels, and unless you have a digital TV, you'd need a box to get those. But I don't believe Charter has announced anything related to that, and anything they do related to it will purely be because Charter wants to carry more things digitally so they can add more channels, not because of the broadcast TV switchover. |
|
 BF69
join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN
| reply to thefish said by thefish :
Currently I am subscribed to Charter Expanded Basic through my analog Tv without a cable box (Tv is connected directly to wall outlet).
When the digital switchover occurs next year will I still be able to receive all my expanded basic channels or would I need a digital cable box?
Thanks sigh. I don't what is so confusing about this. No offense but I still don't understand what people don't get about "IF YOU GET YOUR TV FROM AN ATENNA". If you have cable you are NOT getting TV through an atenna. I mean the government when through all the trouble of putting up a website and broadcasting commericals about this that CLEARLY states who is affected and yet stil the confusion.
So I'll make this clear for any future confused people.
Are you getting tv through cable? if YES, then stop worring you are NOT affected. Man I can't wait until Feb 17 2009 gets here. |
|
  Interceptor We want... A Shrubbery Premium join:2000-07-24 Birmingham, AL
·AT&T Southeast
edit: May 9th, @10:09PM
| While I understand this, it is certainly presumptive to assume that cable systems won't take advantage around this time to upgrade all their channels to digital. Although I highly doubt any of the major companies will, don't think for a minute they aren't considering how many more channels they will be able to carry when they eventually get rid of their analog channels. I think the OP has a valid question.
Some light reading: »www.usatoday.com/money/industrie···le_N.htm |
|
 BF69
join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN
| said by Interceptor :While I understand this, it is certainly presumptive to assume that cable systems won't take advantage around this time to upgrade all their channels to digital. Although I highly doubt any of the major companies will, don't think for a minute they aren't considering how many more channels they will be able to carry when they eventually get rid of their analog channels. I think the OP has a valid question. Some light reading: » www.usatoday.com/money/industrie···le_N.htm You're not letting us in on anything new. Charter does in fact have plans to go to all digital. This however has ZERO to do with the digital transition of OTA signals. Charter is doing to to free up bandwidth to offer more HD channels ot keep up with DirecTv. They would be doing this whether or not there was a digital transition going on. Charter is still a good 2-3 years away from going all digital. |
|
  Interceptor We want... A Shrubbery Premium join:2000-07-24 Birmingham, AL
·AT&T Southeast
edit: May 10th, @09:47PM
| Well, I think it DOES have something to do with the digital transition, because the cable companies will HAVE to take some action. As quoted in the link above: quote: Cable companies have two options for dealing with their analog customers when broadcasters turn off their non-digital signals.
They can either convert the digital broadcast signal to analog at the transmission source, referred to as the "head end"; or they can make their systems all-digital and supply customers with a set-top box that will convert the signal back to analog for viewing on older TVs.
So, the cable companies will either have to convert back to analog, or tell their customers they are going entirely digital at that time. Luckily, it appears that Charter will do the conversion for the time being.
But, I do agree with you for the most part, BF69, about how many uninformed people there are. The thing that really irritates me is that many of the retail outlets making the claim that the transition to digital means people have to buy a HD TV. I saw an HH Gregg commercial today stating that the transition was coming, and to come by and talk to their salesmen, who are the "best trained in the field of HD."  |
|
 BF69
join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN
| said by Interceptor :Well, I think it DOES have something to do with the digital transition, because the cable companies will HAVE to take some action. As quoted in the link above: quote: Cable companies have two options for dealing with their analog customers when broadcasters turn off their non-digital signals.
They can either convert the digital broadcast signal to analog at the transmission source, referred to as the "head end"; or they can make their systems all-digital and supply customers with a set-top box that will convert the signal back to analog for viewing on older TVs.
So, the cable companies will either have to convert back to analog, or tell their customers they are going entirely digital at that time. Luckily, it appears that Charter will do the conversion for the time being. But cable companies are not going to go to all digital overnight. So if they were going to all digital, customers would be informed with MONTHS or even over a year to go. And Charter has made it clear while it will eventually go all digital it won't for at least a couple of years and since the original poster was worried about CHARTER cable he really has nothing to worry about.
But, I do agree with you for the most part, BF69, about how many uninformed people there are. The thing that really irritates me is that many of the retail outlets making the claim that the transition to digital means people have to buy a HD TV. I saw an HH Gregg commercial today stating that the transition was coming, and to come by and talk to their salesmen, who are the "best trained in the field of HD."  Yeah I see that too, but it's not just stores I see on websites where so called "experts" are talking about how people with regular TVs will need a coverter box because of the switch to "HD". I hate to inform these "experts" that if they were actually switching to "HD" a converter box wouldn't be any help to anyone with a regular TV. Even the people on TV get it wrong. And I think it does everyone a diservice. Like maybe 10% of people watch the majority of their TV through OTA. If you never told anyone about the switchover most people wouldn't even notice come Feb 17, 2009. |
|