republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Cable Support » Charter HSI/CATV » [CATV] Analog TV with Charter cable
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[CATV] Sudden loss of most but not all channels >79 (Madison, WI »
« [Speed Issues] Game specific  
AuthorAll Replies

BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

reply to thefish
Re: [CATV] Analog TV with Charter cable

said by thefish :

Currently I am subscribed to Charter Expanded Basic through my analog Tv without a cable box (Tv is connected directly to wall outlet).

When the digital switchover occurs next year will I still be able to receive all my expanded basic channels or would I need a digital cable box?

Thanks
sigh. I don't what is so confusing about this. No offense but I still don't understand what people don't get about "IF YOU GET YOUR TV FROM AN ATENNA". If you have cable you are NOT getting TV through an atenna.
I mean the government when through all the trouble of putting up a website and broadcasting commericals about this that CLEARLY states who is affected and yet stil the confusion.

So I'll make this clear for any future confused people.

Are you getting tv through cable? if YES, then stop worring you are NOT affected. Man I can't wait until Feb 17 2009 gets here.


Interceptor
We want... A Shrubbery
Premium
join:2000-07-24
Birmingham, AL
·AT&T Southeast


edit:
May 9th, @10:09PM

While I understand this, it is certainly presumptive to assume that cable systems won't take advantage around this time to upgrade all their channels to digital. Although I highly doubt any of the major companies will, don't think for a minute they aren't considering how many more channels they will be able to carry when they eventually get rid of their analog channels. I think the OP has a valid question.

Some light reading: »www.usatoday.com/money/industrie···le_N.htm

BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by Interceptor See Profile :

While I understand this, it is certainly presumptive to assume that cable systems won't take advantage around this time to upgrade all their channels to digital. Although I highly doubt any of the major companies will, don't think for a minute they aren't considering how many more channels they will be able to carry when they eventually get rid of their analog channels. I think the OP has a valid question.

Some light reading: »www.usatoday.com/money/industrie···le_N.htm
You're not letting us in on anything new. Charter does in fact have plans to go to all digital. This however has ZERO to do with the digital transition of OTA signals. Charter is doing to to free up bandwidth to offer more HD channels ot keep up with DirecTv. They would be doing this whether or not there was a digital transition going on. Charter is still a good 2-3 years away from going all digital.


Interceptor
We want... A Shrubbery
Premium
join:2000-07-24
Birmingham, AL
·AT&T Southeast


edit:
May 10th, @09:47PM

Well, I think it DOES have something to do with the digital transition, because the cable companies will HAVE to take some action. As quoted in the link above:
quote:
Cable companies have two options for dealing with their analog customers when broadcasters turn off their non-digital signals.

They can either convert the digital broadcast signal to analog at the transmission source, referred to as the "head end"; or they can make their systems all-digital and supply customers with a set-top box that will convert the signal back to analog for viewing on older TVs.

So, the cable companies will either have to convert back to analog, or tell their customers they are going entirely digital at that time. Luckily, it appears that Charter will do the conversion for the time being.

But, I do agree with you for the most part, BF69, about how many uninformed people there are. The thing that really irritates me is that many of the retail outlets making the claim that the transition to digital means people have to buy a HD TV. I saw an HH Gregg commercial today stating that the transition was coming, and to come by and talk to their salesmen, who are the "best trained in the field of HD."

BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by Interceptor See Profile :

Well, I think it DOES have something to do with the digital transition, because the cable companies will HAVE to take some action. As quoted in the link above:
quote:
Cable companies have two options for dealing with their analog customers when broadcasters turn off their non-digital signals.

They can either convert the digital broadcast signal to analog at the transmission source, referred to as the "head end"; or they can make their systems all-digital and supply customers with a set-top box that will convert the signal back to analog for viewing on older TVs.

So, the cable companies will either have to convert back to analog, or tell their customers they are going entirely digital at that time. Luckily, it appears that Charter will do the conversion for the time being.
But cable companies are not going to go to all digital overnight. So if they were going to all digital, customers would be informed with MONTHS or even over a year to go. And Charter has made it clear while it will eventually go all digital it won't for at least a couple of years and since the original poster was worried about CHARTER cable he really has nothing to worry about.

But, I do agree with you for the most part, BF69, about how many uninformed people there are. The thing that really irritates me is that many of the retail outlets making the claim that the transition to digital means people have to buy a HD TV. I saw an HH Gregg commercial today stating that the transition was coming, and to come by and talk to their salesmen, who are the "best trained in the field of HD."
Yeah I see that too, but it's not just stores I see on websites where so called "experts" are talking about how people with regular TVs will need a coverter box because of the switch to "HD". I hate to inform these "experts" that if they were actually switching to "HD" a converter box wouldn't be any help to anyone with a regular TV. Even the people on TV get it wrong. And I think it does everyone a diservice. Like maybe 10% of people watch the majority of their TV through OTA. If you never told anyone about the switchover most people wouldn't even notice come Feb 17, 2009.
Forums » US Cable Support » Charter HSI/CATV[CATV] Sudden loss of most but not all channels >79 (Madison, WI »
« [Speed Issues] Game specific  


Thursday, 08-Jan 00:37:44 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [160] New Comcast Throttling System 100% Online
· [111] After 10 Years Of Service, Charter Declares Home 'Unserviceable'
· [105] iTunes Dumps The DRM
· [71] AT&T, Verizon Stocks Tumble
· [54] Feds Start Wait List For DTV Converter Coupons
· [52] Cable To Grab 75% Of New Subs In 2009
· [46] DOCSIS 3.0 Gets Faster
· [39] Verizon Again Tweaks DSL Bundles
· [38] Netflix Via LG HDTVs
· [36] New Zealand's 'One Strike' Piracy Law
Most people now reading
· MLPPP: Fail - ERX06 [TekSavvy]
· Can't order UVerse and then cancel TV later [AT&T U-verse]
· Powering AC worklights off of DC batteries [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Archivis' Guide to Naxx (10-man) [World of Warcraft]
· [ Professions] Northrend Herbalism and Mining Tracks [World of Warcraft]
· anyone else getting high pings and slow speeds now? [TekSavvy]
· Should I open this USPS insured package that is BEAT TO SH#* [General Questions]
· aluminium wiring? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Customers punished and sent to ERX06 ! [TekSavvy]
· Bandwidth Limits - All discussion here [Comcast HSI]