Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Canadian Network Neutrality Protest May 27 » How is this a "Network Neutrality" debate/protest?
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Canadians censor the net  

tertech

join:2008-04-12
Ottawa, ON


1 edit

Re: How is this a "Network Neutrality" debate/protest?

said by Johnncanuk :

nobody is willing to invest heavily enough to be competitive without using another providers assets.
Whose assets? I kinda recall the Canadian taxpayer funding those assets and entrusting them to Bell to maintain. In exchange for their services, Bell had a legislated monopoly for years. Now suddenly the infrastructure is theirs?

Johnnycanuk

@bell.ca

Re: How is this a "Network Neutrality" debate/protest?

Definitely agree for the copper loop. The internet infrastructure, such as DSLAM, Core routing equipment, etc. was not. It was built on Bell Nexxia's dime and the return on investment flows through Sympatico. The argument could be made that wireline dollars funded that, but you could also argue that it was built after the CRTC opened up the market to competition.

tertech

join:2008-04-12
Ottawa, ON

Re: How is this a "Network Neutrality" debate/protest?

said by Johnnycanuk :

It was built on Bell Nexxia's dime and the return on investment flows through Sympatico.
R.O.I. also flows through the $20/mo/customer that the 3rd party ISPs pay Bell for the leasing of those DSLAMS, core routing equipment, etc. I'm just guessing here, but I could imagine that more revenue is generated through just providing that leased pipe than would be generated by a Sympatico customer, given the additional overhead of Internet access and individual billing accounts.

Sean

join:2004-01-23
Ottawa
·Bell Sympatico

said by Johnnycanuk :

Definitely agree for the copper loop. The internet infrastructure, such as DSLAM, Core routing equipment, etc. was not. It was built on Bell Nexxia's dime and the return on investment flows through Sympatico. The argument could be made that wireline dollars funded that, but you could also argue that it was built after the CRTC opened up the market to competition.
Are you fuckin stupid?

Where did the "return on the dime" come from? Nothing would have happened without consumer tax dollars. They would not have the network to run their DSLAMs on without the network.

You can't seperate it. THEY MADE MONEY BECAUSE WE LET THEM. Just because they reinvest those profits, does not mean those profits were not the result of tax payer money.
Forums » Canadian Network Neutrality Protest May 27« Canadians censor the net  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 10:09:29 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [62] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [53] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [37] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [30] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [22] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [13] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [8] Vivendi Agrees, Comcast/NBC Deal Soon
· [7] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [4] Monday Evening Links
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Heating - my dad gave me this advice... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [News] Windows 8 Release 2012? [Microsoft Help]
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· buying a one way ticket [General Questions]
· [Rant] called out sick! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Prevx says MS Nov 10 patches causing BSOD problems [Security]
· Callcentric and 3-way calling [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Fun screwing with PuG raids. [World of Warcraft]