<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Shure in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20460041</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:08:03 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:08:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Shure</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20460041</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/908026"><b>PDXPLT</b></A> : Most of Shure's wireless microphone products in the TV bands are being used illegally, by those who don't possess the proper license to use them legally.  They know full-well this is the case, and want to keep the "white space" all to themselves.  They've got the gall to adopt this "holier than thou" attitude of arguing against legal unlicensed devics in this band, so that their <i>illegal</i> unlicensed devices aren't disadvantaged.  Geesh.<br><br>I'm always amazed the press never picks up on this angle, and just blandy and unquestionally reports what the wireless microphone proponents tell them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20460041</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 00:49:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shure</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20454911</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/400265"><b>Subaru</b></A> : I remember awhile back Shure said they were going to say something to the FCC about the block that is being sold.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20454911</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:18:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
