<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>YAWN......... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20460749</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:59:10 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:59:10 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: YAWN.........</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20462965</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1048555"><b>BF69</b></A> : "It also requires schools to make "reasonable" attempts to prevent copyright infringement on their networks"<br><br>REASONABLE is not defined and colleges could very well make a token effort and claim it's reasonable and the RIAA or state can't do jack about it since they never defined what REASONABLE means.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20462965</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:28:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: There is the cheap way of just useing NAT as with out.......</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20462149</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/697933"><b>53059959</b></A> : howcome nobody stands up to these guys?<br><br>there should be picketers outside the riaa headquarters.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20462149</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 16:23:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: There is the cheap way of just useing NAT as with out.......</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20461890</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/906493"><b>knightmb</b></A> : Where can I see exactly who in Tennessee passed this? I try to keep up with the politics of my state, but have not heard anything about this yet?   :mad:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20461890</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 14:59:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: There is the cheap way of just useing NAT as with out.......</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20461200</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1161087"><b>Hobyboyz</b></A> : They just need to make sure they have in the bill that the RIAA has to pay these colleges for the upgrades to their servers and manpower. Colleges should not have to fork over the funds for this but RIAA since they are 1) a private company 2) pushing this bill forward.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20461200</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 11:49:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>YAWN.........</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20460749</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464133"><b>a333</b></A> : Can't the RIAA enforce copyright already? Why is it that they keep trying to get others to enforce copyright of their crappy product. To me, it seems they want to have their stupid laws enforced, but don't want to cough up the money to do so themselves. In any case, encryption on p2p is getting better eveyday, and since this is a bill to ban "illegal" filesharing, it'll be a dud to enfoce. There's no way colleges can afford to inspect the contents of EVERY packet that passes through their network. And they can't ban students just because they USE p2p, since ppl can easily say they were downloading a Linux ISO, or the latest NIN album/single release, or just getting WoW patches. <br>Pathetic.....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20460749</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 09:22:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>There is the cheap way of just useing NAT as with out.......</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20460710</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/844746"><b>Joe12345678</b></A> : There is the cheap way of just useing NAT as with out forwarding P2P will be slowed down.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20460710</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 09:08:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
