<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>[CATV] RCN Considers Lawsuit against NFL Network in RCN</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20464063</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:00:05 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:00:05 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>[CATV] RCN Considers Lawsuit against NFL Network</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20464063</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1459885"><b>moulder3</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6515727.html" >www.multichannel.com/article/CA6515727.html</A><br><br>I know this news is a couple months old, however I'm hoping someone from RCN can comment on whether there was a resolution. For the record, I stand with RCN 100% on this issue--NFL Network has bullied EVERYONE into insanely high rates throughout the year, only so we can get EIGHT games a year.  ...And as it turns out, apparently if the game is big/historic enough, NFL Network will cave to govt. pressure and allow everyone to watch the game.<br><br>So why are we paying so much for the network then?!? I'd love to see a class-action lawsuit against NFL Network, on behalf of RCN subscribers, saying we want our $$$ back!!!<br><br>In the meantime, can someone from RCN comment as to if there was a resolution with NFL Network?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20464063</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 01:57:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
