Cyborg994
join:2005-04-18
Montreal, QC
| reply to jat
Re: Proof Bell throttles everything but known ports/protocols
In my experience with the throlling so far, I also noticed that having any p2p app running greatly affects my SSH sessions, to the point where they are unsuable (high latency, packet loss, slow speed, lost connexion ). Even using vi is a pain...
I consider it important not to run ssh servers on port 22, but even the one running on it is affected.
When I don't run any p2p app everything is fine. Also SSH works great when I run p2p apps outside of the throttling period, so it's not an issue with my local settings.
So much for the throlling only affecting p2p... |
|
UT_CK
Premium
join:2008-01-28
 ·TekSavvy Solutions..
·Bell Sympatico
1 edit | When running a P2P application it slows all other applications, including StarWars Galaxy.
If I use P2P, my son's SWG gets 40% packet loss and the ping shoots up to 400. Without p2p, it runs ping 120 and 0% packet loss.
I have to stop all my p2p activity. for his ping and packet loss to be "normal" in SWG.
Regards,
CK
{:(B) |
|
An Onymous
@teksavvy.com | reply to jat
When I run a SSL connection (standard ports 6668,6697,9999) to IRC server, it triggers the throttling on everything else.
So much for affecting P2P only and so much of DPI is independent of ports. |
|
j3richo
join:2007-12-08
Gatineau, QC | reply to Name96
»Setup Multiple VPN servors to combat Bell Throttle? |
|
Savant
Premium
join:2001-08-12
Toronto
clubs: 
| reply to teksuebell
said by teksuebell :
Great work!. Please send your info not just to CRTC but PLEASE SEND IT TO:
www.michaelgeist.ca
mgeist@uottawa.ca Michael Geist is a waste of time imho. He lost all credibility in my eyes when he endorsed and supported Cleanfeed Canada. If that is not an affront to 'net neutrality' then I don't know what is.
--
Could be better, could be worse, could be Monday... |
|
SteveJ
@bell.ca
| reply to jat
said by jat  :I'll see about playing with it tomorrow. Maybe I'll write something to test it in a reliable way. I don't think it should be too hard. If you figure something out it would be much appreciated. I tried
myself and ran into the problems you described. Additionally, I'm not
sure how to rate limit the sender so that it doesn't transmit packets
faster than the nominal DSL downlink rate. |
|
Kdee
join:2005-08-26
Etobicoke, ON | reply to jat
It's in the blogasphere:
»itnerd.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/···be-bell/ |
|
