Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC to Test DTV Transition » Not a good test ...
Uniqs:
132
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Nationwide »
« Loest common denominator  

amigo_boy

join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
·Cox HSI
·magicjack.com

Not a good test ...

... when it's announced four months in advance. The results of the test won't be representative of the preparedness of the rest of the country because they won't have had the additional buzz about this topic which North Carolina will (as evidenced by this news item being picked up and distributed by others, like DSLR).

Mark
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA

Re: Not a good test ...

You mean like all of the commercials and articles discussing the Feb 09 cutoff date for everyone else? If anything, this is a bad test because everyone else will still have 5 months remaining to purchase their digital receivers.

amigo_boy

join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
·Cox HSI
·magicjack.com

Re: Not a good test ...

said by openbox9 See Profile :

You mean like all of the commercials and articles discussing the Feb 09 cutoff date for everyone else? If anything, this is a bad test because everyone else will still have 5 months remaining to purchase their digital receivers.
The stated purpose of the test is to gauge how many people are unaware of the Feb. transition, and extrapolate those results to the rest of the nation. I think that extrapolation will be flawed because NC news will be abuzz about the Sept. cut-off *test* even more than the rest of the nation will be about the Feb. cut-off.

Mark
systems2000
What? You Say It's Fixed. Hah

join:2001-11-29
Cyberspace

Re: Not a good test ...

This isn't necessarily true.

Everyday viewers of OTA television may not know who to call when the stations go off the air.

It already has happened with the CW translator station WDCA50 out of Martinsburg, WV earlier this year, when they just turned the station off one day to test why Comcast was having problems receiving their digital channel.

First, since OTA is licensed by the FCC for the benefit of the community, how can Comcast get WDCA to shut-down a translator station that has no requirement to stop transmitting in Feb. of 2009.

Second, there was no notice of the shut-down and only those who know how to use the FCC website to get contact information to WDCA will complain (there were seven of us according to the broadcast engineer I talked to).

Third, the WDCA translator transmitter served many viewers up and down the I-81 corridor from VA to PA and now there is no CW service for most OTA viewers within this area now.

Fourth, I was told they would turn the transmitter back on in a couple of days and include a scroll across the screen asking those who were viewing the station to contact WDCA, which never happened because the transmitter has not been reactivated.
--
Personal Theme Song:
RUSH - Mystic Rythms from Power Windows.

Rush Radio Website

BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN


1 edit
said by amigo_boy See Profile :

... when it's announced four months in advance. The results of the test won't be representative of the preparedness of the rest of the country because they won't have had the additional buzz about this topic which North Carolina will (as evidenced by this news item being picked up and distributed by others, like DSLR).

Mark
Please anyone that doesn't know about this now doesn't deserve to watch TV. Jeez I've known about this digital transition for about a dozen years now.

amigo_boy

join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
·Cox HSI
·magicjack.com

Re: Not a good test ...

said by BF69 See Profile :

Please anyone that doesn't know about this now doesn't deserve to watch TV. Jeez I've known about this digital transition for about a dozen years now.
Sheesh. I wasn't arguing for the test, or concern for those who don't know about the transition. Just saying that announcing the test (in a geographic location) four months in advance, and claiming this will be a gauge of the rest of the nation is flawed by the fact that it's going to be in local NC news for four months.

That will make the results inapplicable to the rest of the country who is getting only the normal buzz about Feb (which the govt. is apparently worried isn't enough).

It would have been better to have a nationwide "test" in September.

Mark

BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

Re: Not a good test ...

said by amigo_boy See Profile :

said by BF69 See Profile :

Please anyone that doesn't know about this now doesn't deserve to watch TV. Jeez I've known about this digital transition for about a dozen years now.
Sheesh. I wasn't arguing for the test, or concern for those who don't know about the transition. Just saying that announcing the test (in a geographic location) four months in advance, and claiming this will be a gauge of the rest of the nation is flawed by the fact that it's going to be in local NC news for four months.

That will make the results inapplicable to the rest of the country who is getting only the normal buzz about Feb (which the govt. is apparently worried isn't enough).
If people are so unaware they don't know about the transition they won't know about the test. Those that do know about the transition well who cares if they know? How will that mess up the test? what some peole might buy boxes or new TVs earlier? who cares that's actually a GOOD thing.

Fact is if this test was never announced no more than 10% of the population would have noticed anyways.

It would have been better to have a nationwide "test" in September.
No it wouldn't. A smaller test makes it easier to figure out if there is any issues.

JE
Can I Taste It? Mmmm
Premium
join:2000-12-15
Brooklyn, NY

said by BF69 See Profile :

said by amigo_boy See Profile :

... when it's announced four months in advance. The results of the test won't be representative of the preparedness of the rest of the country because they won't have had the additional buzz about this topic which North Carolina will (as evidenced by this news item being picked up and distributed by others, like DSLR).

Mark
Please anyone that doesn't know about this now doesn't deserve to watch TV. Jeez I've known about this digital transition for about a dozen years now.
THANK YOU!
--
BLAZIN' FAST OOL @: 27.883/4.7233 Can Your ISP Go This FAST? VRoOoOoOoOm!
-- I Have: ZA Suite 6.0.631.003 | ICQ: 16705298 | YaHoo IM: Gemini365i | AOLIM: EdGei365i | FWD#: 452620 | VoIP#: Hmmm... |

Forums » FCC to Test DTV TransitionNationwide »
« Loest common denominator  


Thursday, 03-Dec 00:36:08 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [95] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [79] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [62] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [39] AT&T, Verizon Drop 3G Ad Dispute
· [38] Charter Exits Chapter 11
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Do I have a problem due to AVAST? [Security]
· MS admits Windows Updates principally created to annoy [Security]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· [WIN7] When exactly should you flash bios when installing new OS [Microsoft Help]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]
· 16% packet loss. damn dsl. los angeles [AT&T West]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]