site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
225
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


devilshaven

@rogers.com

cat and mouse

cat and mouse they just go round and round, the more complicated DRM protection they put on applications, the more hackers will want to crack it just for fun, just to show off that company's keep spending millions on is useless and in the end completely pointless.

3 systems limit WTF I'll play it today, in the next 3 years I'll probably change/upgrade my system several times, and in 4 years time i won't be able to play the game i paid for, maybe instead of selling games they should just rent them, this looks like its not sale, not something i owen, more like something i leased/rented for a few years and then i can just throw the media away, it seems to me ea is taking more care on making DRM protection on games then actually making good games

morisato

join:2008-03-16
Oshawa, ON
Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL

I like to change my hardware alot The 3 systems Limit can suck a Big one I have No problem authenticating to get patches, Fine by me not like i am not there anyways. Personally for a single Player game The CD based Drm is best imo. disc must be in drive. for Multiplayer games a Key system Imposed, and said key is required to get any patches. etc.. The whole concept of limiting installs is only going to bite the game makers in the ass adding more labour costs and bad pr.



Lowtarget
Premium
join:2003-12-22
Alger, OH

Even if EA goes ahead with the new DRM on new games. Given some time the pirates will be able to crack it. There is far more people cracking software then making it. Thats just the facts of life I hate to say.


Wednesday, 30-May 13:04:26 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics