<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Parents Experencing Speed Issues on Wild Blue in WildBlue Satellite</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20476325</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:17:52 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:17:52 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Parents Experencing Speed Issues on Wild Blue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20488623</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1234625"><b>Island Jeff</b></A> : Are all those WB hops failing to respond to ICMP for you as well? That does look very odd compared to mine on the old bird where they all respond.<br><br> 9  208.175.175.34 (208.175.175.34)  2.139 ms  2.370 ms  2.244 ms<br>10  dal-core-01.inet.qwest.net (205.171.25.13)  2.103 ms  2.248 ms  2.236 ms<br>11  ewr-edge-04.inet.qwest.net (205.171.17.50)  41.695 ms  41.871 ms  42.085 ms<br>12  63.227.232.222 (63.227.232.222)  96.108 ms  96.023 ms  95.945 ms<br>13  10.242.110.1 (10.242.110.1)  96.198 ms  96.190 ms  96.114 ms<br>14  10.242.100.1 (10.242.100.1)  96.140 ms  96.100 ms  96.416 ms<br>15  10.242.30.27 (10.242.30.27)  96.432 ms  96.482 ms  96.196 ms<br>16  10.242.30.1 (10.242.30.1)  96.370 ms  97.692 ms  96.820 ms<br>17  10.242.20.2 (10.242.20.2)  96.543 ms  97.088 ms  97.007 ms<br>18  67-54-18y-xx.cust.wildblue.net (67.54.18y.xx)  1257.470 ms  1257.292 ms  1257.153 ms<br><br>again<br><br> 8  er1-te-2-1.dallasequinix.savvis.net (204.70.204.145)  1.981 ms  2.293 ms  2.659 ms<br> 9  208.175.175.34 (208.175.175.34)  1.677 ms  2.541 ms  2.687 ms<br>10  dal-core-01.inet.qwest.net (205.171.25.13)  2.948 ms  2.985 ms  2.831 ms<br>11  ewr-edge-04.inet.qwest.net (205.171.17.50)  41.979 ms  41.422 ms  41.546 ms<br>12  63.227.232.222 (63.227.232.222)  96.009 ms  96.007 ms  95.903 ms<br>13  10.242.110.1 (10.242.110.1)  95.855 ms  96.084 ms  96.223 ms<br>14  10.242.100.1 (10.242.100.1)  96.181 ms  96.103 ms  96.121 ms<br>15  10.242.30.27 (10.242.30.27)  95.852 ms  96.013 ms  95.979 ms<br>16  10.242.30.1 (10.242.30.1)  96.386 ms  96.345 ms  96.273 ms<br>17  10.242.20.2 (10.242.20.2)  96.831 ms  97.491 ms  96.632 ms<br>18  67-54-18y-xx.cust.wildblue.net (67.54.18y.xx)  1288.285 ms  1868.613 ms  1868.436 ms<br><br>If ICMP is set to the lowest priority, it makes me wonder if they're doing some network reconfiguration there or some other maintenance that has things up in the air or very overloaded.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.beaverbeacon.com/Beaver_Island_Broadband_DSL_Internet/">Very happy TDS DSL user</a> | <A HREF="http://www.beaverisland.net/Broadband_Internet">Wildblue  in Lake Michigan</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20488623</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:15:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Parents Experencing Speed Issues on Wild Blue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20485789</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1294435"><b>Siryak</b></A> : I am beginning to think it is not just him. I am here on Beam 40 and my speeds are still about what it is showing above and I'm on the Pro-Pack. I just tested at 6:00 AM and they are still below 1mb.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20485789</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:08:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Parents Experencing Speed Issues on Wild Blue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20477387</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/424381"><b>grohgreg</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Spice300 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1312081"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Does "MSP3.ALTER.NET" mean the server is located in Mississippi?   </div>MSP3 is quite likely <b>M</b>inneapolis-<b>S</b>t <b>P</b>aul<br><br>//greg//<br><small>--<br>HN7000S/74cm/1w/ProPlus - G16/1250H/Germantown - NAT 66.82.187.152/Gateway 66.82.25.10/DNS 66.82.4.12 and 66.82.4.8 - Firefox 3 - AVG+Firewall v7.5</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20477387</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:07:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Parents Experencing Speed Issues on Wild Blue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20477129</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1312081"><b>Spice300</b></A> : Bertram, Texas likely uses beam 131 or beam 40 or 41.  It is close to the edges of beams 40 and 41.<br><small>--<br>Value Pack, beam 31, Riverside gateway</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20477129</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:13:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Parents Experencing Speed Issues on Wild Blue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20477041</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1312081"><b>Spice300</b></A> : Your trace route shows that it was run from MIT to your parents computer.  The IP at hop 12 in your second trace route:<br><br>wildblue-msp.customer.alter.net (157.130.115.230) 40.280 ms 40.533 ms 40.440 ms<br><br>does not look like it is related to the Laredo gateway.  Although I am not confident since I do not recall seeing a trace route to the gateway, I think your parents are using the the satellite Wildblue-1, the Duluth gateway and beam 130 or 131.  Does "MSP3.ALTER.NET" mean the server is located in Mississippi?  I thought the Duluth gateway was located in Minnesota.  Do you know when your parents got service from WB?  If it was before April 2007, then they are probably using the satellite Anik-F2, otherwise WB-1 is the best guess.<br><br>The latencies on hop 19 of 1600 ms and 2368 ms are higher than average on WB but are within reasonable range.  Remember the signal must travel more than 22,000 miles to or from the satellite 4 times for a round trip.  Add in the slowness of the gateway and one gets our lousy latency.<br><br>We need your parents to run upload and download speed tests at <A HREF="http://www.testmy.net/"><u>Test My Network</u></a> and post the results here before we can determine if their speeds are atypically slow.<br><br>The proxy has been causing slow download speeds for some of us since December 2007.  If they stop using the proxy, the download speed increases to normal.<br><small>--<br>Value Pack, beam 31, Riverside gateway</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20477041</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:57:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Parents Experencing Speed Issues on Wild Blue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20476848</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1294435"><b>Siryak</b></A> : My speeds have been terrible here lately as well. I usually get 1.6mbps 24/7 and now I am getting this on the pro-pack.<br><br>:::.. Download Stats ..:::<br>Download Connection is:: 813 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 3064 kB)<br>Download Speed is:: 99 kB/s<br>Tested From:: &raquo;<A HREF="http://testmy.net/" >testmy.net/</A> (Main)<br>Test Time:: 2008/05/13 - 3:23pm <br>Bottom Line:: 14X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 10.34 sec <br>Tested from a 3064 kB file and took 30.886 seconds to complete<br>Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 82.2 % of your hosts average (wildblue.net) <br>D-Validation Link:: &raquo;<A HREF="http://testmy.net/stats/id-9BMPE2CYT" >testmy.net/stats/id-9BMPE2CYT</A><br>User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14 [!]]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20476848</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:24:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Parents Experencing Speed Issues on Wild Blue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20476325</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1234625"><b>Island Jeff</b></A> :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>They also mentioned that the problems emerged when Google acquired Wild Blue.<hr></blockquote><br>I believe your parents are misinformed that Google acquired wildblue - as far as I can tell wildblue is simply using google apps for email and portal now.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.beaverbeacon.com/Beaver_Island_Broadband_DSL_Internet/">Very happy TDS DSL user</a> | <A HREF="http://www.beaverisland.net/Broadband_Internet">Wildblue  in Lake Michigan</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20476325</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:42:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Parents Experencing Speed Issues on Wild Blue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20476297</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I've been at my parents house for a few days and they're having connection speed issues with Wild Blue.  Appartently, they say they've been experiencing issues for several months.  They also mentioned that the problems emerged when Google acquired Wild Blue.  I also know that they have many many calls to Wild Blue.  But they've haven't gotten anywhere.  I also don't believe that FAP is the issue here since it hasn't come up on the calls they've had with Wild Blue.  <br><br>They also don't recall receiving any FAP warning emails.  Additionally, the problem has been going on for several months and they're on the Pro Plan.<br><br>Here's some details:<br><br>On the Pro Plan<br>($89 / month)<br><br>Location is near Bertram, Texas [78605]<br>Beam 40 (my this is just a guess from looking at the map)<br><br>Also - here are some traceroute I ran:<br><br>Executing 'traceroute -m 30 -q 1 -w 3 -f 3 75.104.212.x'<br>traceroute to 75.104.212.x (75.104.212.x), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets<br> 3  rtr-border1-p2p-core2.slac.stanford.edu (134.79.252.137)  0.697 ms<br> 4  192.68.191.245 (192.68.191.245)  0.594 ms<br> 5  sunnsdn2-slacmr1.es.net (134.55.217.2)  6.789 ms<br> 6  sunncr1-sunnsdn2.es.net (134.55.209.98)  0.992 ms<br> 7  snvrt1-sunncr1.es.net (134.55.221.37)  0.879 ms<br> 8  188.ATM1-0.BR2.SJC1.ALTER.NET (204.255.174.49)  1.869 ms<br> 9  154.ATM3-0.XR2.SJC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.51.178)  2.004 ms<br>10  0.so-0-0-0.XL2.SJC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.55.126)  1.948 ms<br>11  0.so-7-0-0.CL2.MSP3.ALTER.NET (152.63.65.89)  100.012 ms<br>12  POS7-0.GW3.MSP3.ALTER.NET (152.63.65.205)  101.930 ms<br>13  wildblue-msp.customer.alter.net (157.130.115.230)  103.487 ms<br>14  *<br>15  *<br>16  *<br>17  *<br>18  *<br>19  *<br>20  75-104-212-3.cust.wildblue.net (75.104.212.x)  1367.739 ms<br><br> 1  W92-RTR-1-W92SRV21.MIT.EDU (18.7.21.1)  0.784 ms  0.323 ms  0.283 ms<br> 2  EXTERNAL-RTR-2-BACKBONE-2.MIT.EDU (18.168.1.27)  1.188 ms  1.289 ms  1.832 ms<br> 3  EXTERNAL-RTR-1-BACKBONE-2.MIT.EDU (18.168.1.18)  1.551 ms  0.599 ms  0.925 ms<br> 4  ge-6-23.car2.Boston1.Level3.net (4.79.2.1)  162.281 ms  2.314 ms  1.557 ms<br> 5  ae-5-5.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.132.250)  7.825 ms  17.625 ms  17.927 ms<br> 6  ae-61-61.csw1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.66)  5.636 ms  16.443 ms  17.846 ms<br> 7  ae-1-69.edge1.NewYork2.Level3.net (4.68.16.11)  5.579 ms  5.923 ms  5.726 ms<br> 8  0.ge-2-0-0.BR3.NYC4.ALTER.NET (204.255.173.53)  5.962 ms  6.017 ms  5.729 ms<br> 9  0.ge-5-0-0.XL4.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.3.117)  6.202 ms 0.ge-5-2-0.XL3.NYC4.ALTER.NET <br><br>(152.63.3.165)  6.227 ms  6.009 ms<br>10  0.so-7-0-0.CL1.MSP3.ALTER.NET (152.63.65.81)  34.230 ms  34.164 ms  34.269 ms<br>11  POS6-0.GW3.MSP3.ALTER.NET (152.63.65.201)  34.120 ms POS7-0.GW3.MSP3.ALTER.NET <br><br>(152.63.65.205)  33.145 ms  33.354 ms<br>12  wildblue-msp.customer.alter.net (157.130.115.230)  40.280 ms  40.533 ms  40.440 ms<br>13  * * *<br>14  * * *<br>15  * * *<br>16  * * *<br>17  * * *<br>18  * * *<br>19  75-104-212-3.cust.wildblue.net (75.104.212.x)  1600.880 ms  1413.488 ms  2368.447 ms<br><br>I'd really like to hear what everyone suggests they should do.  I have read other threads on <br><br>this topic.  But I didn't see one that showed a traceroute that had such a delay.<br><br>Thanks,<br>mpb]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20476297</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:36:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
