 sbrookPremium,Mod
join:2001-12-14
Ottawa
kudos:4
 ·TekSavvy Cable
·Rogers Hi-Speed
| This is a decision based on Case Law "This would appear to be only a denial of immediate relief based on proof of "irreparable harm" as defined by Canadian law. "
This should read as required by Canadian Case Law ... in other words in a prior judicial case for an injunction, a court asked for proof of irreparable harm. Because it's Case Law, it's neither defined nor binding on subsequent courts (or in this case a commission) to hold the participants to this standard. What has been missed in this case is the over-riding issue of consumer protection. |
