This is a decision based on Case Law in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20480993 en Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:04:04 EDT Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:04:04 EDT This is a decision based on Case Law http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20480993 sbrook : "This would appear to be only a denial of immediate relief based on proof of "irreparable harm" as defined by Canadian law. "

This should read as required by Canadian Case Law ... in other words in a prior judicial case for an injunction, a court asked for proof of irreparable harm. Because it's Case Law, it's neither defined nor binding on subsequent courts (or in this case a commission) to hold the participants to this standard. What has been missed in this case is the over-riding issue of consumer protection.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20480993 Wed, 14 May 2008 12:15:58 EDT