http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20480994 en Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:08:58 EDT Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:08:58 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20480994 Matt : It looks like they based their decision on the fact no irreparable harm had occurred YET and that the CAIP didn't provide sufficient proof that traffic levels across the GAS network were significantly changed.

Man, that decision is awful. They could have at least granted temporary relief while they decided.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20480994 Wed, 14 May 2008 12:16:03 EDT