<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: This practice will become widespread in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20481421</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:13:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:13:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: This practice will become widespread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20481421</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  R0CKY <A HREF="/useremail/u/1206349"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>This problem really seems to be more about the Telco/Cableco companies who are trying to leverage their ISP presence to serve and gain from their Media/Content presence.<br><br>...just guessing of course! ;)<br> </div>You sir, have guessed... wisely.<br><small>--<br>"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20481421</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:29:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This practice will become widespread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20480588</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1206349"><b>R0CKY</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  hairspring <A HREF="/useremail/u/1505853"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>ISPs represent deep pockets with high risk profiles. They will jump at the chance to put due diligence standards in place to appease the RIAA.<br> </div>I'd suspect this point could be argued, at least from where I stand being part of a pure ISP perspective.  The ISPs that are to gain here are mostly ISPs who are also content providers or Media Providers.  Those who are true-blue ISPs who are there to simply be an Onramp are only going to want to step in and get involved when the law says to do so, otherwise being transparent is healthy for both ISP and client.<br><br>This problem really seems to be more about the Telco/Cableco companies who are trying to leverage their ISP presence to serve and gain from their Media/Content presence.<br><br>...just guessing of course! ;)<br><small>--<br>TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20480588</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:03:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>This practice will become widespread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20480476</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1505853"><b>hairspring</b></A> : ISPs represent deep pockets with high risk profiles. They will jump at the chance to put due diligence standards in place to appease the RIAA.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20480476</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:37:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
