<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Mot should do better ...&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Mot-should-do-better-20482624</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:09:08 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:09:08 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Mot should do better ...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Mot-should-do-better-20491818</link>
<description><![CDATA[kash posted : If msft should stick to software whats google doing in the mix ? shouldnt they stick to searching?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Mot-should-do-better-20491818</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:02:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Mot should do better ...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Mot-should-do-better-20482624</link>
<description><![CDATA[PDXPLT posted : MFST should stick to software.  MOT is a center of RF competence.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Mot-should-do-better-20482624</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:06:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

