Guspaz
Guspaz
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC | reply to morisato
Re: Tomato/MLPPP released (evade throttle or bond two DSL lines)
Any WRT54GL (emphasis on the L) should work just fine, but they're selling only the newest one these days (v1.1) which is what we did all our testing on. Literally, we tested on three of them. |
|
sighs
@freeourbandwidth.com | reply to Guspaz
Please sirs. Make this your next project. »forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topi···9.0.html
The bounty is $100 if you are able to do it. |
|
daboom
join:2001-12-16
Oshawa, ON
 ·Primus Talkbroadband
1 edit | reply to Guspaz
Ok got this all setup was using pfsense so all I needed to do was switch cables when ready to try the mlppp setup.. Ok trying it now and web pages are stalling ie slower to load but not all. and any Broadband speedtests are stalling too givin me horrid results. Mind you from what I see on the torrent side the speed is there.
Speed Test #50890757 by dslreports.com
Run: 2008-05-15 03:11:37 EST
Download: 149 (Kbps)
Upload: 656 (Kbps)
In kilobytes per second: 18.2 down 80.1 up
Tested by server: 7 java
User: 540225 @ dslreports.com
I am thinking it might have something to do with mtu? Cause in a single link my speed is back to normal same as web page responsiveness. As jay Said there was no issues in that area u guys detected. Any thoughts? I will leave it on no mlppp for now. Btw using single mlppp atm.
New speed test under no mlppp setup. No changes to router etc other then turning off mlppp with mtu at 1492
Speed Test #50891106 by dslreports.com
Run: 2008-05-15 03:25:22 EST
Download: 5108 (Kbps)
Upload: 664 (Kbps)
In kilobytes per second: 623.5 down 81.1 up
Tested by server: 7 java
User: 540225 @ dslreports.com
--
Come join us on EFNET irc.dks.ca #teksavvy for live chat 
Java Chat back online @ »teksavvy.kicks-ass.net |
|
DSL_Ricer
Premium
join:2007-07-22
| said by daboom  : and any Broadband speedtests are stalling too givin me horrid results. In kilobytes per second: 18.2 down 80.1 up What MTU was being used? |
|
vitesse
join:2002-12-17
Saint-Jean-Sur-Richelieu, QC
 ·Bell Sympatico
·TekSavvy Solutions..
 ·Videotron
·Look Communications
| reply to Guspaz
I finally had give a try, this is great (will so tomorrow if this is working)
but how can i see my Speedtouch with tomato firmware?
my LAN is on 192.168.1.x
the Speedtouch is at 10.0.0.168
so I tried this on wanup (but this doesn't work)
ip addr add 10.0.0.1/24 dev vlan1 brd +
/usr/sbin/iptables -I POSTROUTING -t nat -o vlan1 -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE
any help?
--
Connection: Teksavvy 6016/800 fast path premium
|
|
gord27
join:2005-05-01
Mississauga, ON
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| reply to codecx
said by codecx :+1 ^ I got my 2 modems in the WRT54GL, and my WRVS4400N WAN port, hooked up to one of its LAN ports. Disabled the wireless & the firewall on the WRT54GL, my WRVS4400N is going to handle all the wireless, DHCP, firewall etc. Anyone know where to get a nice cheap Speedstream 5360 in Toronto? glad to hear. that's what i want to do as well. i'm sure i have an extra 5360 lying around somewhere.
guspaz, any chance this firmware would work on a linksys 350n?? haha, probably not but i happen to have one sitting around not doing anything where as i'll have to go buy a gl. |
|
Guspaz
Guspaz
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC | No, the 350N devices don't even use a MIPS processor. |
|
daboom
join:2001-12-16
Oshawa, ON | reply to DSL_Ricer
your default values at first then i tried a couple of my own. like 1486 |
|
ymboc
join:2003-02-22
Ottawa, ON
1 edit | daboom: I suffered from the same stalling on my WRT54GS v1 though I didn't confirm via speedtest. What hardware do you have?
Please advise if/when you've found a solution. |
|
Tempete
join:2008-05-12
1 edit | reply to Guspaz
For those who can't access their modems anymore, replace vlan1 with br1. It works on my ST516/WRT54GL setup.
Use these lines for a modem on 192.168.1.254:
ip addr add 192.168.1.1/24 dev br1 brd +
/usr/sbin/iptables -I POSTROUTING -t nat -o br1 -d 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQUERADE
And these to access the modem at 10.0.0.138:
ip addr add 10.0.0.10/24 dev br1 brd +
/usr/sbin/iptables -I POSTROUTING -t nat -o br1 -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE
Firmware and UI are great, thanks a lot Guspaz & DSL_Ricer! |
|
Radar73
join:2008-01-20
Ajax, ON | reply to ymboc
Make sure you set the MTU to 1442 or you'll have terrible speed performance using single link MLPPP. |
|
daboom
join:2001-12-16
Oshawa, ON
·Primus Talkbroadband
1 edit | Radar73.. I have it on auto as 1442 using a single link mlppp and it's still stalling and giving very poor results in speedtests. I use the speedtests as they are a excellent indicator if there is a problem where it shows the stalling the most. I am gonna try a different system on wireless side with the single link mlppp on just to eliminate that system or any possible issues.
P.s I am using the Wrt54GL 1.1
Btw thanks again to Guzpaz and Dslricer for this fix not only will u save me throttling headaches but Hydro/electricity as well.
Adding on my quick test from a newer wireless laptop. With mtu of 1442 and single mlppp on. Weird eh. Get different results everytime.
May 15 09:21:24 WRTGL local2.info pppd[3910]: PPP session is 5526
May 15 09:21:24 WRTGL local2.notice pppd[3910]: Starting negotiation on br1
May 15 09:21:25 WRTGL local2.notice pppd[3910]: PAP authentication succeeded
May 15 09:21:25 WRTGL local2.notice pppd[3910]: peer from calling number 00:90:1A:A0:99:31 authorized
May 15 09:21:25 WRTGL local2.info pppd[3910]: Using interface ppp0
May 15 09:21:25 WRTGL local2.info pppd[3910]: New bundle ppp0 created
Speed Test #50899450 by dslreports.com
Run: 2008-05-15 09:23:26 EST
Download: 467 (Kbps)
Upload: 461 (Kbps)
In kilobytes per second: 57.1 down 56.3 up
Tested by server: 319 java
User: 540225 @ dslreports.com
--
Come join us on EFNET irc.dks.ca #teksavvy for live chat
Java Chat back online @ »teksavvy.kicks-ass.net |
|
DabberDan
join:2004-11-15
Gatineau, ON
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| reply to morisato
said by morisato :Anyone Know if i purchase a wrt54gl router is there a possibility of an incompatible version? or do all of those ones work? kinda concerned with Online ordering from Canadacomps :0 and getting a non compliant model. All WRT54GL routers are good for Tomato. From Tomato's site:
If it's not listed above, and it's not a WRT54GL, it's not supported.
|
|
TobiasFunke
Premium
join:2007-02-27
Toronto, ON | reply to Tempete
Bingo! Thanks! |
|
cc86
join:2004-02-24
Waterloo, ON
| reply to Tempete
said by Tempete :For those who can't access their modems anymore, replace vlan1 with br1. It works on my ST516/WRT54GL setup. Use these lines for a modem on 192.168.1.254: ip addr add 192.168.1.1/24 dev br1 brd + /usr/sbin/iptables -I POSTROUTING -t nat -o br1 -d 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQUERADE And these to access the modem at 10.0.0.138: ip addr add 10.0.0.10/24 dev br1 brd + /usr/sbin/iptables -I POSTROUTING -t nat -o br1 -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE Perfect, it works again. Thanks!! |
|
vitesse
join:2002-12-17
Saint-Jean-Sur-Richelieu, QC | reply to Tempete
thanks for the info. this is perfect. |
|
codecx
join:2007-04-16
North York, ON
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| »digg.com/mods/Modified_Tomato_Fi···e_on_DSL
Linked back to this thread, the world must know!
Digg it! |
|
DSL_Ricer
Premium
join:2007-07-22
| reply to daboom
said by daboom :I am gonna try a different system on wireless side with the single link mlppp on Do you still get the problems if you are using a wired connection, not wireless? |
|
Reimer
join:2006-08-14
Toronto, ON
1 edit | reply to Guspaz
Thanks Guspaz and DSL_Ricer for providing this firmware.
Just flashed it on my WRT54GL v1.1 and it works great. However, I'm a Velcom customer and not a Teksavvy customer and I don't even know if Velcom supports MLPPP but it connects anyway.
I was already using tomato 1.17 prior to this and whatever this firmware did, it actually improved my speed tests a tiny bit. I could never get over 4150 but now I get 4274 or so. Small improvement but an improvement nonetheless. Must be the MTU change |
|
DSL_Ricer
Premium
join:2007-07-22
| said by Reimer :However, I'm a Velcom customer and not a Teksavvy customer and I don't even know if Velcom supports MLPPP but it connects anyway. If the remote system doesn't support MLPPP it will simply connect without it.
said by Reimer :Must be the MTU change Actually, no. If you're using the MLPPP Single Link MTU, for regular PPPoE, then it should be performing 0.3% slower than the 1492 MTU and 0.4% worse than optimal.... |
|
