http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20485808 en Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:43:16 EDT Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:43:16 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20486393 Joe12345678 : M$ likes to force some updates.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20486393 Thu, 15 May 2008 10:25:50 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20485808 six9 : I'm running WSUS 3.0 SP1 and it still has the same issue that 3.0 had. I thought the upgrade would fix it instead of hosing my machine. I had to reinstall and it screwed up the database and updates. I might have to delete all the updates and redownload them.

Anyway, as we all know XPSP3 came out. As we all know, it's not necessarily approved yet in our environments. This update is causing my reports to all show that I have a TON of computers that need it. I do not want to approve it for all. I do not want to decline it because it is approved for a test group. But I just want the dadgum thing to not show up as a needed update. Is there any way to make non-approved updates hidden in the reports. I know it was like that in the old 2.x version. This is driving me nuts. If not, that is a feature M$ seriously needs to implement. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20485808 Thu, 15 May 2008 08:15:15 EDT