riiiight in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20486017 en Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:58:29 EDT Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:58:29 EDT Re: riiiight http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20486642 en102 : Their article claims to have only tested in NY/CT area.
--
Canada = Hollywood North]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20486642 Thu, 15 May 2008 11:14:50 EDT Re: riiiight http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20486306 patcat88 : Agree, Sprint EVDO has always been regarded as faster than Verizon EVDO.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20486306 Thu, 15 May 2008 10:09:15 EDT riiiight http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20486017 techjoe :

The slowest of the three cellular data networks, the Sprint network delivered on average 494Kbit/sec. download speeds to my notebook. That's roughly a third slower than AT&T's network. Its average upload speed was 294Kbit/sec. and the network's top speed was 1.2Mbit/sec. It connected in 3.7 seconds.


494kbit? Hmm thats strange, everywhere I go with my Sprint I clock ~700kbit-1mbit download rates. I've been to a half dozen states, urban and rural-ish areas.

At work I benchmarked AT&T vs Sprint quite a few times and Sprint always came out on top transfer speed-wise. Our users have been trading in their AT&T cards for Sprint left right and center over the past year or two as well.

YMMV definitely on this one I guess.
--
Baka wa shinanakya naoranai]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20486017 Thu, 15 May 2008 09:11:17 EDT