http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20486762 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:56:21 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:56:21 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20487037 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20487037 Thu, 15 May 2008 12:35:22 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20486908 said by primeangel:

yeah ive been trying since they posted that story here originally...always says its busy
I managed a result once; out of about ten tries. Said my ISP wasn't interfering.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20486908 Thu, 15 May 2008 12:09:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20486907 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20486907 Thu, 15 May 2008 12:08:46 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20486882 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20486882 Thu, 15 May 2008 12:03:09 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20486872 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20486872 Thu, 15 May 2008 12:01:30 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20486793 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20486793 Thu, 15 May 2008 11:45:43 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20486779
Edit:
I finally got a test to run(not the bittorrent test, but a link characteristic test):
[att=1]

]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Glasnost-Project-20486779 Thu, 15 May 2008 11:43:14 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Glasnost-Project-20486762
Anyway, I'm glad they updated their results to note that none of the ILECs are using forged packets. That still makes we wonder about their data however. Did they re-evaluate their detection methods for ALL tests, or did they just re-inspect the ILEC results?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Glasnost-Project-20486762 Thu, 15 May 2008 11:38:29 EDT